They increase machining costs which increases the cost of the weapon. I've been shooting and carrying a gun for decades. Can't think of one time when I needed or wished I had front serrations. I don't want to pay more for a gun when I'm doin so for a useless feature.
I'll throw it back at you. How does not having front serrations inhibit you?
As for the photo of the 19m... I just searched the image at tineye and the results are the same image with finger grooves. I suspect the pic on GT is photoshopped. Plus, let's face it - anyone showing off a photo would likely show the other side to prove its real and let the world see the ambi slide stop lever.
I don't think the magazine base plate pictured actually meets the specifications of the FBI RFP as it does not look like it protrudes forward of the grip...
Have a small ledge (“toe”) on the front of the magazine to aid the shooter in rapid extraction of the magazine. This ledge must protrude forward of the grip (nominally 0.10” - 0.15”) to enable the non-shooting hand to strip the magazine from the pistol.
--Page 10
"When the phone rang, Parker was in the garage, killing a man."
How do you see the chamber more easily? I'm not understanding.
What do you call speed loading? I'm a slide stop lever guy... But with overhand technique I've never had an issue with using rear serrations and I'd rather have my hand further from the muzzle - especially if doing something quickly and under stress.
ETA: was a pain to get a pic by myself but this is basically how I press check every day before holstering. I can see everything and my hand doesn't need to be anywhere near the muzzle. I still submit that front serrations are nothing more than decoration. There's nothing a shooter can't do without them. And the shooter isn't sacrificing speed that I can see. People seem to forget they came about for race guns with optics. Suddenly people wanted them on carry guns for CDI points.
Last edited by El Cid; 07-21-2016 at 07:49 PM.