I hear tell that Chanel Iman is no good at cooking and cleaning. And yet.Originally Posted by secondstoryguy
I hear tell that Chanel Iman is no good at cooking and cleaning. And yet.
Michael@massmeans.com | Zeleny@post.harvard.edu | westcoastguns@gmail.com | larvatus prodeo @ livejournal | +1-323-363-1860 | “If at first you don’t succeed, keep on sucking till you do succeed.” — Curly Howard, 1936 | “All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.” — Samuel Beckett, 1984
Oh, OK. I’m guessing you had no trigger time with Tracking Point, either.
Michael@massmeans.com | Zeleny@post.harvard.edu | westcoastguns@gmail.com | larvatus prodeo @ livejournal | +1-323-363-1860 | “If at first you don’t succeed, keep on sucking till you do succeed.” — Curly Howard, 1936 | “All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.” — Samuel Beckett, 1984
Some, a year or so back. It still has a way to go.
It's no skin of my nose whether you buy one or not, but I wouldn't be buying one just yet.
https://www.facebook.com/dave.bateman.311
kimbers have more issues than time magazine.
Muchly improved this year.
Michael@massmeans.com | Zeleny@post.harvard.edu | westcoastguns@gmail.com | larvatus prodeo @ livejournal | +1-323-363-1860 | “If at first you don’t succeed, keep on sucking till you do succeed.” — Curly Howard, 1936 | “All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.” — Samuel Beckett, 1984
You can buy a whole lot of money in ammo for the cost of one, and be a much more proficient marksman. The single biggest issue is you still have to make a wind call... inexperience is inexperience in this department. Judging the wind, making shots and learning cannot be replaced with current technology.
Once that sensor package is developed, then they'll have a game changer.
You'll have to do a little review when you get one.
https://www.facebook.com/dave.bateman.311
kimbers have more issues than time magazine.
Reply With Quote