My current JMCK AIWB rig is for a Sig p320c with an XC-1 light. The options are as follows:
No extra tuck
Minimal wedge
Thick Kydex
Split loop
Full sweat guard, wrapped around rear sight
I add my homemade Junk Carry Pillow.
(On left: JMCK IWB #3. On right: JMCK AIWB as described above)
Last edited by Clusterfrack; 01-19-2016 at 07:09 PM.
“There is no growth in the comfort zone.”--Jocko Willink
"You can never have too many knives." --Joe Ambercrombie
Here's an earlier build, also with minimal wedge, and no extra tuck for a G19.
“There is no growth in the comfort zone.”--Jocko Willink
"You can never have too many knives." --Joe Ambercrombie
hows the comfort with the xc1?Originally Posted by Clusterfrack
My current JMCK AIWB rig is for a Sig p320c with an XC-1 light. The options are as follows:
No extra tuck
Minimal wedge
Thick Kydex
Split loop
Full sweat guard, wrapped around rear sight
I add my homemade Junk Carry Pillow.
(On left: JMCK IWB #3. On right: JMCK AIWB as described above)
Excellent. This holster has the best comfort and concealment I've ever had. The greater area for the light creates padding that removes pressure on the inner thigh and really tucks the grip. Also, because Tony used a vacuum fit for this holster, it has solid retention with and without the XC1.
“There is no growth in the comfort zone.”--Jocko Willink
"You can never have too many knives." --Joe Ambercrombie
very cool, I really wish they would make the switches better.
I bought mine second hand, but it has been absolutely perfect. It is built for a glock 17, although I carry a 19 and 17 in the same holster
extra tuck
1.5" Loops
Mid guard
I added some mole skin from dr.scholls to the rear of the holster where it contact's my body. Crossing the loops over each other while on the belt holds it very securely without the fear of it "sliding" down the belt as the day goes on.
Thank you everyone who has replied to this! It seems that the extra tuck is about 50/50 people saying it is the way to go or not. Hmmmmm may have to wait on a few more responses before I decide. Also if you want the sweat guard wrapped around the sights do you just specify that in the comments? or is this a standard option?
This is not a standard option as far as I know. Tony Mayer is on this forum regularly, so you could send him a link to the image I posted.
I don't see the point of the extra tuck if you use a large pad/wedge.
If you are skinny, you might consider asking for "minimal wedge" (like the George option). I found the standard wedge to cause an odd looking bump that prints at the belt, causing people to ask, "what's that?".
Last edited by Clusterfrack; 01-20-2016 at 12:05 PM.
“There is no growth in the comfort zone.”--Jocko Willink
"You can never have too many knives." --Joe Ambercrombie
The rear sight protection is standard on the full guard now. I received one recently and it works great to keep my Dawsons from tearing up my stomach
Have another one on the way with the foam wedge instead of extra tuck, probably will be the way I go in the future. Sometimes the extra tuck doesn't cause bug me and other times (mainly sitting for more than 20 minutes in the car) it really starts to get uncomfortable
Last edited by pr1042; 01-20-2016 at 12:08 PM.
Attachment 5564
G19 in G17 length extra tuck with med guard and 1.5 spit loops
Attachment 5565
S&W 64 snub. JMCK can handle the wheels also.
Contact Tony and he will point you in the right direction on your set-up.
Reply With Quote
