That is cool because this is how humanity advances. It's not by reinventing the wheel every generation. We have to stand on the shoulders of the people who came before us and figure out how to reach even higher.
Totally agree.
I think it's great that you use Comstock/hit factor scoring on this. Par times are a bit of a blunt instrument. I really prefer open-ended scoring for time, and that's one thing I really like about the RMHCST, the FAST, and it's why I prefer the IDPA Classifier to the Hackathorn Standards.
I absolutely do.
I like the balance myself, at least if shot in good faith by someone who is honestly trying to get good hits at speed. I should try it again trying to go as fast as I can and see how the score comes out for me, even if it's with worse shooting - I do like that kind of scoring experiment. I personally think Comstock/hit factor scoring is pretty good, when used with Minor scoring (which the RMHCST effectively uses.) I can definitely understand the criticism of hit factor scoring when we are talking about Major caliber in USPSA. I think Minor is a good balance though.