Yes, you're right. But, investigative reporters have a job & that doesn't usually involve only investigating other reporters, does it ?
The Rappoport and NYT articles are well written, the Intellihub article is a bit over the top.
That said, when an ad hominem attack is employed - 'crack pot', 'tin foil hat', 'conspiracy theorists', etc it serves to shut down further inquiry. And that can get in the way of finding out the truth, especially if that may run counter to held opinions . It often doesn't even require a 'Grand Conspiracy' to explain things. Many times, there's a dollar sign involved.
Maybe the whole story is that a group of 'nutty', or at least foolishly misguided, people occupied a building out in the middle of nowhere and were arrested, with one of them killed. - And just maybe there's more to the story. IMO there's not enough evidence to say at this point.