This manner of response shouldn't be happening in 2017, but I still see it all the time it seems. You could claim a certain amount of ignorance I suppose in the 60's but the Officer Survival Movement has been an influence for over four decades now and this sort of stuff clearly falls into the "Don't Do It 101" category.
The path of least resistance will seldom get you where you need to be.
I've witnessed this "Vapor Lock" syndrome before ..... it's ugly and dangerous for everyone involved. I had a Officer that worked on my squad lock-up so badly that he had to be transported to the ER by EMS and he didn't recover for some time after he arrived there. We thought he had suffered some sort of physical injury in the fight that led up him locking up. When they examined him at the ER, he didn't have a mark on him anywhere.
I expressed my concerns (in writing) about his fitness for duty but it was summarily ignored. He carried on for 30 years and retired at a pretty decent rank. Most everyone with their head screwed on straight simply adapted to these realities as working with incompetent/incapable co-workers was just a fact of life.
Last edited by 41magfan; 10-18-2017 at 01:13 PM.
The path of least resistance will seldom get you where you need to be.
"The deputies decided to use a Taser on Jackson to "gain compliance," the statement said, "when Deputy Charles Gillis mistakenly drew his firearm instead of his Taser, firing one shot into Jackson's arm."
Whoops! Glad nobody got killed.
"I need your help. I can't tell you what it is, you can never ask me about it later, and we're gonna hurt some people."
Just to clarify the article stated that the officer was not responding to a call at that location but was coincidentally stopping by the business. If he pulled up right to the front doors in clear view of people inside that would be really poor choice of actions for responding to any call or crime. Pulling into a business lot and not taking a look prior to parking is not the best way to do things in a marked car and in uniform but isn't as egregious a mistake.
The path of least resistance will seldom get you where you need to be.
I don't see where we have different ideas. I said as much in my first post you quoted. I just didn't want any readers to think the officer was responding to a call at the business when he was going there for a beverage or snack. It still doesn't make for a good habit to pull up without checking things out but very different from responding to a call.
Re: panic attack video situation - I decided to put my thoughts down in a post - http://www.vdmsr.com/2017/10/train-to-think.html
SLC, UT: Guy walks away, ignores commands, jacks car, gets tazed, gets mad, punches officer, takes baton, gets shot. Doesn't get much more straight forward than this. Judging by the spatter patterns, at least one those rounds hit a large vascular structure. He died on scene. The first Officer suffered a broken nose and ankle. And for a bit of "I'm too old for this shit" irony: the responding backup officer that fired the first volley of rounds was on his last shift before retirement from the SLCPD. The suspect had previously served time for attempted murder and had jumped parole, hence the encounter with police.
"I need your help. I can't tell you what it is, you can never ask me about it later, and we're gonna hurt some people."