Ran into this nomenclature buried in the federal solicitation for the MHS.
Does anyone have any insight?
Ran into this nomenclature buried in the federal solicitation for the MHS.
Does anyone have any insight?
Yes.
It is unfortunately highly flawed and does not match any of the substantial LE derived handgun standards and results derived over the past 30 years. For that matter, it does not follow what the DOD JSWB-IPT standardized on in 2002-2006 after spending 6 million dollars, firing over 10,000 test shots, and analyzing extensive combat data.
It is brought to the American taxpayer by the same stellar folks who stole the M855A1 design...
Facts matter...Feelings Can Lie
I was afraid a few months ago that this was going to happen. We'd be better off with ball ammo vs crappy JHPs
I am the owner of Agile/Training and Consulting
www.agiletactical.com
I googled "Federal Tissue Damage Model" and found nothing that appeared relevant. Could someone here provide a link where we could find the model online? Thanks.
Hokey religions and ancient lubricants are no match for a good Group IV PAO
Owner 360 Performance Shooting