Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Week 122: Front Sight (USPSA Classifier CM 99-23)

  1. #11
    Leopard Printer Mr_White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Gaming In The Streets
    Quote Originally Posted by nwhpfan View Post
    Thanks, I baring any crazy HQ math...I should get bumped next time they run the numbers.
    Fingers crossed there's no craziness in the numbers. You definitely deserve the M card.
    Technical excellence supports tactical preparedness
    Lord of the Food Court
    http://www.gabewhitetraining.com
    0
     

  2. #12
    Site Supporter taadski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    Nice! Congrats. Certainly seems like the skill level is there. [thumbs up]
    0
     

  3. #13
    I finally calmed down and decided to pay bit more visual attention and shot an 80% on my third run (I know, I know)
    Not to get all Enos like, but between visual awareness, visual acceptability, and visual patience, the "patience" part was always the toughest for me. I think that'a pretty normal.
    0
     

  4. #14
    Site Supporter taadski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    😎 I like Enos.

    I appreciate the comment. I'm totally on board with what you're saying. I've heard it , I've read it, and I've dedicated myself to working diligently on it....but still, when the buzzer goes off/things start rocking, it's REALLY easy to click back into old modes. The hardest thing for me is trusting that the speed will still be there.



    t
    0
     

  5. #15
    Leopard Printer Mr_White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Gaming In The Streets
    Gen3 G34, concealed in a Keeper under a polo shirt
    Limited (Minor)
    52 total points
    4.31 total seconds
    12.064965 HF
    90.22% in Limited Division

    First string was kind of slow and choppy. Second string was fairly brisk. My targets were spaced extra-wide because the target carrier placement meant either too wide or too narrow, so I went with too wide.

    Technical excellence supports tactical preparedness
    Lord of the Food Court
    http://www.gabewhitetraining.com
    0
     

  6. #16
    Member MVS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    MI
    Equipment used (pistol, holster, optional concealment garment if one was used) Gen4 G17 Prosights, Fricke Archangel, t shirt concealment
    Division Limited Minor
    Total points 60
    Total time 7.15
    Hit factor (points divided by time) 8.39
    Percentage (your hit factor divided by the 100% hit factor for your Division) 62.75%
    Last edited by MVS; 07-31-2015 at 09:05 PM.
    0
     

  7. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Northwest
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr_White View Post
    Gen3 G34, concealed in a Keeper under a polo shirt
    Limited (Minor)
    52 total points
    4.31 total seconds
    12.064965 HF
    90.22% in Limited Division

    First string was kind of slow and choppy. Second string was fairly brisk. My targets were spaced extra-wide because the target carrier placement meant either too wide or too narrow, so I went with too wide.
    That looks good....but did you know; they sell paper tape the same color as your target?

    I usually buy this.
    Last edited by nwhpfan; 07-31-2015 at 10:53 PM.
    A71593
    0
     

  8. #18
    Member Luke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Alabama
    Gen 4 17 Dawson sights OWB holster. Production division.

    60 points
    8.40 combined time
    (Only had a few rounds so didn't get to shoot it as much as I wanted, I'm pretty sure I could speed things up and get it down to a combined 6 seconds with all A's.
    What's weird is that I was quicker facing up range and turning and drawing!

    I think this is like 59%?

    Pic is looking at the shot timer after the drill, my buddy randomly took it! Notice the bamboo target stands? Forgot my stakes at home.. Improvising. A pocket knife makes a decent machete)

    0
     

  9. #19
    I ran this drill / classifier 4 times.

    G34, strong side OWB
    Production

    49 points
    6.88 seconds
    7.12 hit factor
    56%

    52 points
    7.31 seconds
    7.11 hit factor
    56%

    53 points
    8.42 seconds
    6.29 hit factor
    50%

    58 points
    8.42 seconds
    6.88 hit factor
    54%

    I then ran a modified version of the el prez (same distance and target set up and got 58 points in 9.91 seconds.
    0
     

  10. #20
    Gen 3 G-17 Blade-Tech, open carry.
    Production.
    58 points, 11-A, 1-C.
    6.52 total time.
    Hit Factor: 8.896
    Percentage: 70%.

    I looked up the other times I had shot this;
    2006 Limited; 66%
    2003 Production; 58%
    2003 Revolver; 71%. I probably shot this with the 3 inch Model 10 in my avatar.
    0
     

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •