Originally Posted by
Dagga Boy
Much of the "condition" came from a Todd Green post in 2009:
"As for the PX4, I've seen too many struggle on the line to have much faith in them. I was working at Beretta when it was being designed and we (the LE/mil team) warned them against using that rotating barrel. It was a disaster in the Cougar and while the PX4 system is improved, it still doesn't work as well as the proven tilt-barrel system.
When the members of Beretta's IDPA/USPSA pistol team were told they had to start using the PX4, most of them quit instead. They quit their paid, sponsored positions rather than shoot the gun. Clue.
Last year I had a handful of Canadian LEOs in a class who are issued the PX4 in .40 S&W. They literally had to bring a mallet with them to the class. A mallet? Yeah, I was confused, too. Then every 300-500 rounds of shooting, their guns would jam shut and they had to use the mallet to get the things apart.
I'm far from a Beretta basher. I'd carry a 92G (or better yet, a 92G Vertec) without losing a moment's sleep. But the PX4 was another misstep from Italy."
Don't know about validity, truth, if it was an actual gun issue or maintenance issue, etc. I was simply aware of some discussion. For me, the guns have been reliable as mine are all NP3'd. For what it's worth,being around LEO's with guns does not give me the warm and fuzzy' sin regards to real issues versus self inflicted problems. I figure it is safe to say, the PX4 is a gun that likes being wet. Same thing we saw with a long history with the SiG P series guns. NP3 was very popular at my old agency with the P series guns, and it alleviates any potential issues for guns and systems that seem to work best with a lot of lubrication,