If a VP45 comes out, would it be considered as suitable a field pistol as the USP?
If a VP45 comes out, would it be considered as suitable a field pistol as the USP?
And I'm wondering how suitable a stainless P220 would be as a super launcher?
There's a whole thread from earlier this year about stainless vs aluminum classic Sigs. The frame itself should last OK, but in .45, the all-steel ones go through takedown levers considerably faster than the aluminum frames. Even if resprung for .45 Super, you'd probably go through those even faster. Stronger takedown levers have been made, but are no longer available from Sig.
Well, thanks to GJM and all of you other enablers I have a V2 LEM P2000 coming that I found lightly used for a smoking deal. Before you protest regarding going with a P2000, that's the only (near) full-size 9mm HK on the "Safe Handgun" approved roster in California and thus the least expensive way to try a HK LEM. Can't wait to run it and see how I like the LEM trigger. I'll be ordering a V3 hammer spring and a reduced power FPBS to experiment with.
I am convinced that the USP 45 is the best pistol for woods defense, but I am not convinced that the ammo available will work measurably better than the same bullets in 45 acp or +P. A 220 with your favorite bullet would likely be just fine. If it was intelligently altered via recoil spring weight/hammer/mainspring/flashlight/maybe something else? I imagine it would hold up to limited amounts of 45super just fine.
Please do not put a beating on me for this one; but I recall the Ruger P90 was originally designed for the 10mm cartridge and thus was over-built for the .45 ACP chambering. Perhaps an alternative for hot +P ACP or Super 45.