Hillary, American Uranium for Russian Money, Tax Fraud.....

[Palmguy]

So, this happened:

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...mid=tw-nytimes

I'm sure those 30,000 e-mails that were deleted from Hillary's private e-mail server (while they were under subpoena) really were just about yoga classes and wedding plans though...


Oh, and also this:

Hillary Clinton's family's charities are refiling at least five annual tax returns after a Reuters review found errors* in how they reported donations from governments, and said they may audit other Clinton Foundation returns in case of other errors.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...source=twitter

*: "Errors" = Reporting zero donations from foreign governments since 2010 while actually receiving "tens of millions of dollars"**.

**: "Tens of millions of dollars" = $122.5M in 2009.

[BaiHu]

Tip of the iceberg with our government, I'm sure. The Clintons just finally pissed off enough of their colleagues.

[Palmguy]

Most importantly:

[BaiHu]

Yes, there's that too.

[RoyGBiv]

Was just reading this story this morning.
When a Democrat has lost the NYT, that says something.

Still, I wouldn't count her out. She has more lives than a cat.

[LostDuke]

Most importantly:

A few things have to happen for you to be wrong, among which that newspapers keep digging what is surely a huge dirt mine, and that we can put together a good candidate in earnest. A bloody prolonged primary will give her a huge lead and dissipate the effect of some of those early discoveries.

There are plenty more yoga classes where this came from, but people forget fast.

[Dagga Boy]

Hilary in 2016....Free Hilary phones!which will be like an iPhone 7......winner in a landslide.

[Jeep]

The NYT might be reporting this because it no longer thinks she is left-wing enough, but there is little chance that this will get much traction in the press. Maybe a hard-to-follow one-time recitation on the nightly news and then it will disappear.

After all, in the end, most of the media would rather have a corrupt, lying, cheating left-winger in power than someone who favors, for example, the 2nd amendment.

[Tamara]

The NYT might be reporting this because it no longer thinks she is left-wing enough, but there is little chance that this will get much traction in the press. Maybe a hard-to-follow one-time recitation on the nightly news and then it will disappear.

She's been catching a lot of flack from the left-leaning media on the Sunday morning talking head shows and NPR for some time now.

Those in the Foxbaugh bubble probably haven't yet picked up the vibe that she's the Left's McCain, but it's definitely there. The undertone of her campaign thus far is "Seriously, who else are you gonna vote for?" and that never caucuses well. She's even more vulnerable to a primary challenge from her own Left this time around than she was the last time she was Inevitable.

[Totem Polar]

She's even more vulnerable to a primary challenge from her own Left this time around than she was the last time she was Inevitable.

There is that.