Not an expert either; very far from one actually.
Like others here, I've also taken classes from Bram Frank and others and I carry blades every day, either as support to my carry gun, or by themselves if I couldn't carry a gun and the law still allowed blades.
As far as public perception is concerned, yeah using a blade in self defense is not going to look good compared to using a gun and, depending on the DA, one would would probably have to spend more to defend oneself in court for using a knife. However, if your self defense claim is solid (just like it would be if you used a gun), the odds of winning are very high. Like in the use of the gun if you can document your training, show and explain why you did what you did, it goes a hell of a long way towards legal victory.
As to the Kali/escrima/arnis training, there is a big difference between what you see in magazines and what is actually taught by folks who focus FMAs for present day self defense. What Mike Janich teaches is heavily influenced by FMAs, as is what Southnarc teaches (from what I've seen and read, I haven't taken one of his classes yet) after all the Pikal knife is, I believe, a descendant of the Pekiti Tirsia Philipino knife art; Bram Frank's "biomechanical cutting" approach (not too dissimilar from Janich's system) is an almost traditional Philipino approach and I won't mention the Sayok system, and there are plenty of others (I think Taranis' approach has more of a Pencak silat origin). While the traditional "defang the snake" approach (as taught to beginners) is not as applicable as it once was the concepts that it carries are still very useful.
P.S. Like Nyeti (whose design,the HiTS I got introduced to by our own Hizzies' article in modern service weapons and presently carry) the closest to "naked" is an Emerson folding Karambit for me. Both knives are wonderful tools for everyday living, which is the primary work they do (the Karambit for light stuff and the HiTS for heavier work), and really serve well for defense.