When comparing terminal performance of two rifle rounds in the same caliber (lets use 50gr TSX, and 70gr TSX), does velocity trump KE?
I understand that above "about 1800-2000fps" TSC is a mechanism of injury and tissue damage.
The 70gr and 50gr TSX loaded to 5.56 pressure will have similar KE out to about 50ish yards or so. However, their velocities are much more radically different.
Both will penetrate through/through on an unobstructed shot at a badguy, I would think, based on gel and on-game performance in the field.
Both expand to similar diameters (around 0.45-0.5").
However, the 50gr loading is traveling much faster.
Does this velocity translate into on-target performance, or after you hit that "magical" 1800-2000fps barrier, is it "pretty much all the same"?
Also one asks...would the 70gr TSX perform better, conversely, as it sheds less energy passing through the target, thus maintaining more/higher velocity "over-all" during its trek through said target?
I realize this is a more academic question, but it's one I've been curious about ever since talking to a friend of mine who shoots hundreds of hogs per year. His experience is that 70gr TSX loads drop hogs harder than the conventional bonded bullets, the 70gr drops them harder than the 62, and so on. I figure after shooting hundreds of animals, trends DO emerge. I am wondering...why? What's the science or mechanism behind it? Is the higher penetration (and thus implied velocity-through-target) of the TSX the reason? Something else? What makes a 70gr TSX that expands to .50" so much more effective than a 64gr Gold Dot that expands to 0.50" when both pass through the target?