Page 13 of 19 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 190

Thread: SIG MCX review

  1. #121
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition
    Quote Originally Posted by DMCutter View Post
    I've had 2 range sessions where I had my Romeo 4T on my MCX 300 zeroed and my first string of fire was about 4" low and left at 100 yards. The mount was tight so I rezeroed and continued to march. I thought maybe the sight was f'ed up but I didn't really want to send it back to Sig. I finally got a Wheeler FAT wrench and just checked the barrel bolts and neither was close to 60 in-lb. Hopefully that was the reason for the shift. When it stops raining I'll go to the range and see what it looks like.
    Quote Originally Posted by HeavyDuty View Post
    I’ll check my Rattler - thanks for the heads-up!
    Quote Originally Posted by DMCutter View Post
    Tightening the bolts made a couple clicks difference. I got it zeroed again with 150 grain Ammo Inc FMJ and all was good. I finished up with a couple mags of 108 grain frangible and 125 grain PPU hp and POI was about 3" high. Muzzle velocity of the 150 is about 1850 fps and the lighter loads are close to 2200, so I guess that makes sense. Still minute of badguy, I just need to be conscious of what I've got in my mags.
    I’m glad I checked. Both were well short of even 40 in-lb.
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  2. #122
    Damn. Sig is gonna get us kilt in da streets. Interested to know what effect on your zero tightening them will have.

  3. #123
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    out of here
    Virtus upper arrived so I can put it on the rattler lower.

    Name:  1E865444-BCE0-4BD8-9992-711416A28000.jpg
Views: 400
Size:  81.2 KB

  4. #124
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    out of here

    IIIA

    The shooter in the Buffalo killings was wearing body armor.

    “The gunman shot four people outside the store, three fatally, said Buffalo Police Commissioner Joseph Gramaglia. Inside the store, security guard Aaron Salter, a retired Buffalo police officer, fired multiple shots. A bullet hit the gunman's bulletproof armor but had no effect, Gramaglia said.

    The gunman then killed the guard, the commissioner said, then stalked through the store shooting other victims.”

    If I’m going to have a long-ish gun, I want it to be able to do long gun things.

  5. #125
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    out of here
    I’m channeling my inner @HCM

    If I’m going to go small, go small.

    MI handguard and Vulcan ACSS optic.

    Muzzle brake threaded for Rugged Razor.

    Name:  BCF1450C-602A-455A-9E94-E6F6E064F77D.jpg
Views: 336
Size:  27.8 KB

  6. #126
    Quote Originally Posted by JCN View Post
    The shooter in the Buffalo killings was wearing body armor.

    “The gunman shot four people outside the store, three fatally, said Buffalo Police Commissioner Joseph Gramaglia. Inside the store, security guard Aaron Salter, a retired Buffalo police officer, fired multiple shots. A bullet hit the gunman's bulletproof armor but had no effect, Gramaglia said.

    The gunman then killed the guard, the commissioner said, then stalked through the store shooting other victims.”

    If I’m going to have a long-ish gun, I want it to be able to do long gun things.
    If it’s plates no luck anyway. If it’s soft armor, supersonic 300 blk should punch through it no problem. The biggest issue would be actually having the MCX available in the first place. You’d probably be working with a 9mm most likely.

  7. #127
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    out of here
    Quote Originally Posted by Corse View Post
    If it’s plates no luck anyway. If it’s soft armor, supersonic 300 blk should punch through it no problem.
    False.

    Name:  DA7FD546-5C31-48C3-A5FA-4CD714C8EC64.jpg
Views: 325
Size:  44.6 KB

    Supersonic Barnes TTSX does NOT penetrate IIIA.

    The Rattler barrel is just too short and too slow with standard conventional 300 supers.

    In the supermarket shooting, there wouldn’t have been time to deploy an MCX.

    But if you did have a Rattler with supers, you might be sorely disappointed when encountering IIIA.

    Name:  12F46B82-6D2A-4FD1-B1CF-B12D86A4BC76.jpg
Views: 319
Size:  42.2 KB

  8. #128
    Quote Originally Posted by JCN View Post
    False.

    Name:  DA7FD546-5C31-48C3-A5FA-4CD714C8EC64.jpg
Views: 325
Size:  44.6 KB

    Supersonic Barnes TTSX does NOT penetrate IIIA.

    The Rattler barrel is just too short and too slow with standard conventional 300 supers.

    In the supermarket shooting, there wouldn’t have been time to deploy an MCX.

    But if you did have a Rattler with supers, you might be sorely disappointed when encountering IIIA.

    Name:  12F46B82-6D2A-4FD1-B1CF-B12D86A4BC76.jpg
Views: 319
Size:  42.2 KB
    Interesting. Is this the 110 or 120 gr? Do you know the velocity?

    I’ve chronographed the 110s at over 2000 FPS from the rattler. They were definitely on the hot side though.

  9. #129
    Gray Hobbyist Wondering Beard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    The Coterie Club
    Quote Originally Posted by JCN View Post
    False.

    Name:  DA7FD546-5C31-48C3-A5FA-4CD714C8EC64.jpg
Views: 325
Size:  44.6 KB

    Supersonic Barnes TTSX does NOT penetrate IIIA.

    The Rattler barrel is just too short and too slow with standard conventional 300 supers.

    In the supermarket shooting, there wouldn’t have been time to deploy an MCX.

    But if you did have a Rattler with supers, you might be sorely disappointed when encountering IIIA.

    Name:  12F46B82-6D2A-4FD1-B1CF-B12D86A4BC76.jpg
Views: 319
Size:  42.2 KB
    That load has, as I understand it, a polymer tip which, at least theoretically, would bend when encountering armor thus limiting its capability to penetrate.

    I hope someone who knows those loads well would confirm, and I wonder if other loads, without such a tip, would actually penetrate.
    " La rose est sans pourquoi, elle fleurit parce qu’elle fleurit ; Elle n’a souci d’elle-même, ne demande pas si on la voit. » Angelus Silesius
    "There are problems in this universe for which there are no answers." Paul Muad'dib

  10. #130
    Quote Originally Posted by JCN View Post
    False.

    Name:  DA7FD546-5C31-48C3-A5FA-4CD714C8EC64.jpg
Views: 325
Size:  44.6 KB

    Supersonic Barnes TTSX does NOT penetrate IIIA.

    The Rattler barrel is just too short and too slow with standard conventional 300 supers.

    In the supermarket shooting, there wouldn’t have been time to deploy an MCX.

    But if you did have a Rattler with supers, you might be sorely disappointed when encountering IIIA.

    Name:  12F46B82-6D2A-4FD1-B1CF-B12D86A4BC76.jpg
Views: 319
Size:  42.2 KB
    That’s really interesting. I’d love to see more testing. My understanding is that the TTSX is the go-to supersonic bullet for short-barreled .300 blk. It’s surprising to see it can’t reliably penetrate soft armor. I wonder if this is the case for all supersonic .300 blk that isn’t specifically marketed as armor piercing, when fired from such a short barrel, or if this is specific to the TTSX. I’d be curious how some of the newer solid-copper stuff would do. If supersonic .300 blk out of a short barrel does generally have a tough time with soft armor, what are the advantages of supersonic over subsonic ammunition in something like a Rattler?
    My posts only represent my personal opinion and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or official policies of any employer, past or present. Obvious spelling errors are likely the result of an iPhone keyboard.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •