Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: This is interdasting......

  1. #31
    Member Wheeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Jawja
    Quote Originally Posted by caleb View Post
    I've been told that it's because of chamber pressure - a .22 Mag out of a pistol is operating at a higher pressure than a .38 Special +P. You have to cut those walls awful thin to fit 8 .22s in a cylinder that small, and maybe trying to squeeze 8 rounds in there that are operating damn near 9mm levels makes Ruger's engineers a little squicky.
    I was running on the assumption that there wouldn't be much difference in wall thickness between the .357 Mag chambers in a five shot and the .22 Mag chambers in an 8 shot.
    If anyone has a .22 version and would be willing to measure the wall thickness between chambers I'd be happy to measure my .38 just to satisfy curiosity.

  2. #32
    Member Al T.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Columbia SC
    Got two at the store. I'll try and remember as I "work" there tomorrow.

  3. #33
    Very Pro Dentist Chuck Haggard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Down the road from Quantrill's big raid.
    Everything I have seen shows the .22lr and .22mag to be at the same pressures.

  4. #34
    Site Supporter Bigghoss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Anna Kendrick's fantasies
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    It would be even more interesting as a 22lr.
    Agreed.


    Quote Originally Posted by Hizzie View Post
    Hopefully this is Ruger testing the waters for a full sized combat tupperware revolver. A 3-4" poly Security Six in 357 would be awesome.
    I would like to see that.


    Quote Originally Posted by Sidheshooter View Post
    I will echo this, and repeat my request for a 3" 5-shot DAO .44 special with slightly scaled up LCR frame and lockwork.

    A bulldog with the attributes of a postmodern flexing, lightweight poly frame, and even smoother camming trigger geometry would be compelling. Welcome to the new 70s...
    I'd like to see this in .45acp cut for moon clips.



    Quote Originally Posted by Al T. View Post
    .22 Magnum would be very, very interesting.
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Haggard View Post
    Especially if they unkittened themselves and made it a 7 or 8 shooters instead of being a 6 shooter
    Would like to see this also.

  5. #35
    Member Hizzie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Texas
    LGS has one. $439. Liked the grip. The cylinder release needs to be bigger. Trigger was light but not smooth.
    Quote Originally Posted by caleb View Post
    Oh man, that's right. I forgot that some people feel like they need light SA triggers in DA guns instead of just learning to shoot the gun better. You can get a Redhawk DA trigger pull down to 10 lbs, and if you can't manage that you suck and should probably just practice more.
    *RS Regulate Affiliate*

  6. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    CA&ID
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Haggard View Post
    Especially if they unkittened themselves and made it a 7 or 8 shooters instead of being a 6 shooter
    Yeah, didn't understand that, since Smith already had theirs out in 7 shot.

    .22 Mag in some of the new defense loadings make a 7 shot revolver look pretty viable for a recoil sensitive person to use for HD/CCW.

  7. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    CA&ID
    Quote Originally Posted by Hizzie View Post
    Hopefully this is Ruger testing the waters for a full sized combat tupperware revolver. A 3-4" poly Security Six in 357 would be awesome.
    Whoa. THAT would be interesting...... My Security Six/Speed Sixes are treasured favorites. But a lightweight one would be really cool.

    Don't know if there's enough market for a medium frame .357 for them to do it though.... but there should be.....

  8. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    In exile
    I'm a revolver guy too. Part of the appeal of a good DA revolver is the classic good looks. Like my 3" M13, 4" M686, etc. But since Ruger is dispensing with steel and making a good portion of the thing out of polymer then I guess they get to decide what it looks like. A lightweight 6 shot, 3" carry revolver would seem to fill a void, especially since S&W won't make any more.

  9. #39
    Very Pro Dentist Chuck Haggard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Down the road from Quantrill's big raid.
    I'd really like to see a hard use modern construction/materials wheelgun, something that can be field stripped like my Security Six, and that can better withstand things like dust, sand and getting dunked than the older revolvers.

  10. #40
    Site Supporter Totem Polar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    PacNW
    ^^^Where's the "thumbs up" icon? I think there is plenty of agreement about this on P-F.com; we just need to work on Ruger.com.

    As an aside, I got to fondle one of these beasts at my LGS over the holidays. With the barrel and OEM grip as provided by Ruger, it's definitely a bigger envelope than an SP101--I see no real carry advantage over, say, my old 2" model 12. The 3" LCR is a *lot * bulkier than my 3" 36-1 in carry trim, albeit way lighter.

    The advantage to the whole concept is making a given platform (eg. 5-shot snub) lighter, cheaper. Do that with a 6 or 7 shot gun, sure. But making a 5-shot bigger is an answer in search of a question.
    JMO.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •