Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 134

Thread: IDPA deletes flat-footed reload rule, wants feedback on new division

  1. #11
    Leopard Printer Mr_White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Gaming In The Streets
    Quote Originally Posted by YVK View Post
    I think the idea is to separate guns that are truly practical for carry from everything else that shows up in SSP. Shooting 4 inch, 24 oz Glock 19 against 4.9 inch 38 oz Beretta 92 is hardly a fair competition, yet they are both SSP now.

    I think this is a right move. They should get CCP for compact guns, set a minimum trigger pull weight and allow appendix carry.
    If they allowed appendix I'd actually have a bit of a dilemma.
    Technical excellence supports tactical preparedness
    Lord of the Food Court
    http://www.gabewhitetraining.com

  2. #12
    I meant they should allow appendix carry for all divisions. You and I could shoot in SSP considering our choice guns are generally accepted as a service size, while folks who run 19s/229s/2000 etc can have a fair game within CCP.

    I also feel pretty strongly about minimal trigger pull weight.

  3. #13
    Deadeye Dick Clusterfrack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    ...Employed?
    Well this is a step in the right direction, and I'm glad that IDPA seems to be listening to its shooters.

    I voted for optics as well, because it would add something really different.

    AIWB would be a very welcome addition! Maybe next year?
    “There is no growth in the comfort zone.”--Jocko Willink
    "You can never have too many knives." --Joe Ambercrombie

  4. #14
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Off Camber
    Laser and Optic

  5. #15
    Site Supporter rob_s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    SE FL
    What's the highest anyone has ever placed with a G19 at a major match and/or nationals?

  6. #16
    Member orionz06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Seems like some hope and change we can believe in.
    Think for yourself. Question authority.

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    What's the highest anyone has ever placed with a G19 at a major match and/or nationals?
    Has anyone ever shot a major match and/or Nationals with a G19?

  8. #18
    Site Supporter ST911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    Quote Originally Posted by YVK View Post
    I think the idea is to separate guns that are truly practical for carry from everything else that shows up in SSP. Shooting 4 inch, 24 oz Glock 19 against 4.9 inch 38 oz Beretta 92 is hardly a fair competition, yet they are both SSP now.
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    What's the highest anyone has ever placed with a G19 at a major match and/or nationals?
    Quote Originally Posted by YVK View Post
    Has anyone ever shot a major match and/or Nationals with a G19?
    Good points. I think that makes the differences and benefits more apparent at more significant matches.
    الدهون القاع الفتيات لك جعل العالم هزاز جولة الذهاب

  9. #19
    Member Wheeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Jawja
    Quote Originally Posted by YVK View Post
    Has anyone ever shot a major match and/or Nationals with a G19?
    I personally know of two shooter that shot G19's at the 2001 and 2002 Nats with G19's and one that shot a P239 in 2002. None were 'competitive' shooters in the sense of the game.

  10. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Wheeler View Post
    I personally know of two shooter that shot G19's at the 2001 and 2002 Nats with G19's and one that shot a P239 in 2002. None were 'competitive' shooters in the sense of the game.
    How'd they do in a sense of result placement?

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •