"For a moment he felt good about this. A moment or two later he felt bad about feeling good about it. Then he felt good about feeling bad about feeling good about it and, satisfied, drove on into the night."
-- Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy --
You guys talking about one of these? Never even heard of it before this thread. Good battery life?
#RESIST
Yup, that's it.
Battery life is only a day or two continuous.
But it has a visible etched reticle so illumination isn't needed during the day.
"For a moment he felt good about this. A moment or two later he felt bad about feeling good about it. Then he felt good about feeling bad about feeling good about it and, satisfied, drove on into the night."
-- Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy --
Why does the spitfire have so many knobs?
Are the flip caps removable?
Are there other mounting options?
Where was the Aimpoint positioned on the rifle? Similar to the Prismatic? I had the same problem. Oddly enough I also shot the Prismatic as that is what we issued to new rifle officers. I was having headaches with the Aimpoint and not with the Prismatic. I went to the doctor who said I was getting old (astigmatism) and needed glasses. It turns out he also shot long range rifle. He laughed and suggested that I was probably looking through the reticle on the Prismatic and unable to do it on the Aimpoint. He suggested that if i moved the Aimpoint forward (it was close to the same eye relief/spot as the Prismatic) a bit I might find it more workable. Basically I was trying to focus on the red dot just like I did the front sight of the pistol. I'm not sure if moving it forward helped or if it was the new glasses but the eye strain did go away. I had never worn glasses before so I'm not really sure which did it.
What you do right before you know you're going to be in a use of force incident, often determines the outcome of that use of force.
So as to not hijack a thread about a different product, I will post my reply to your questions in this thread when I get off work today.
http://pistol-forum.com/showthread.p...light=Spitfire
Necropost!
Now that some of y'all have several years experience and the opportunities to have used both, what are your thoughts on the Leupold vs. the Vortex Spitfire 1x?
They appear to be basically equivalent, except for secondary issues like battery life, stuff like that.
From a shooting perspective, the fact that the Leupold reticle includes cross hairs seems like it might be an advantage at distance when trying to work in holdover and/or "Kentucky windage." And in the case of relying on the etched reticle without illumination in daylight, it might be a little easier/faster to put the X over the target than to put just the circle-dot of the Vortex.
The old version of the Spitfire 1x can be had at Cabela's fairly often for $170 + tax. The new version is still more. New version has some advantages, but old version may have some advantages if used on a non-AR. I'm seeing more of the Leupolds show up on fleabay lately for somewhere in the lower $2xx range, and have been thinking about picking one up to compare.
Worth it? Or a waste of time?
Anybody heard what Leupold swaps it out with if it can't be repaired and needs to be replaced under warranty?
.
-----------------------------------------
Not another dime.
I replaced the Prismatic with a Trijicon ACOG TA44 1.5x16.
For red dots I found that the Trijicon MRO has a lot less starburst than a Aimpoint to my eyes.
My MR762 is topped with a Elcan Specter DR so no problems there.
I also had LASIK done which helped some as well (but not as much as i'd hoped).
"For a moment he felt good about this. A moment or two later he felt bad about feeling good about it. Then he felt good about feeling bad about feeling good about it and, satisfied, drove on into the night."
-- Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy --