I apologize if this should be in the Law Enforcement forum, but I thought I might get more input from members here...
I am a fairly new LEO. I have been off probation for a while now, but I still like to consider my options. This is a second career for me, and I tend to take a more thoughtful approach to my job than many of my coworkers. If I am off-base here, or placing emphasis on something that is really not that important, feel free to point it out to me.
I am a member of a large (though not the largest) West Coast Sheriff's Department. Our weapons policy, I am discovering, is incredibly liberal. I can carry just about anything, as long as it is chambered in 9mm, .40, or .45. The department will supply my duty ammo (currently HST, with the heaviest bullet for the caliber I choose). Additionally, they supply the practice ammo, and I can go in weekly to use the range on their dime. Our issued weapon is a Gen 3 G22 and a Safariland ALS holster. Typically, that is what you observe, but I see Sigs, HKs, and 1911s regularly. As I'm sure most of you can attest, most cops are not "gun guys", and will carry whatever is free. Though I have always owned guns, I didn't care about them much, either, until they became one of the tools I rely on.
The Glock I was issued is pretty reliable. I have had a few FTFs, etc. here and there, but nothing that makes me distrust the weapon. I don't currently mount a light on it, but I would like to. Those coworkers that do mount a light often end up switching to a different weapon altogether soon after. I also really like the ALS holster, and insist on staying with that system, unless someone more experienced can make a good case that something else is better.
I qualify with the Glock easily, but my scores with my off-duty weapon are consistently higher. My off-duty weapon is a HK P2000 LEM in 9mm. Originally, I was using a Gen 4 G23 off-duty to maintain similarity between on and off-duty weapons, but I also appendix carry, and I was uncomfortable with carrying a safety-less striker fired pistol that way. I prefer to carry in that position because it is easier for me to conceal a reasonably large pistol.
I am thinking of purchasing a second P2000 and using that as my duty weapon. I can mount a X300 to it, and the ALS holster is available for that pistol. Additionally, it has a track record of reliability. I do not care about the whole 9mm vs. .40 cal debate, as I find it hard to believe there is a meaningful difference between the two, whether I am shooting through car doors or not. I have read Nyeti's opinion about the suitability of the LEM trigger system for law enforcement, and it made a lot of sense to me. The down sides I see for the P2000 are the diminished capacity of the magazines, the compact size of the weapon, and the lack of a safety. The safety is only a issue because of concerns I have regarding the admittedly remote possibility of losing my weapon in a fight. That is part of the reason I like the ALS system so much.
My questions are: 1) would I be better off purchasing a P3000S TDA instead? Safariland does not make a holster for that weapon with a light installed, but I have read that the ALS holster for the Sig P229 with x300 fits the HK like it was made for it, so I think my holster choice is covered. 2) Am I over-emphasizing the safety issue, and does the use of the ALS mitigate the need for a safety the way I think it does?
At the end of the day, I would like my off-duty and on-duty weapons to be as similar as possible.
If there is any angle I am not considering, let me know.