Hi I'm new to the forum. I really appreciate the wealth of knowledge from proffesionals and shooters that have actual experience. IMHO this is one of if not the best firearms boards.
I've read over the years here and on a few other reputable sights about the SIG P220 .45 durability/reliability issues mainly in reference to high round counts. It makes sense that the same design in 9mm would be more durable.
I used to own a P220 Carry SAO. Sold it stupidly and would like to pickup another and make it my training pistol(model). I'd probably buy 2 if not 3 so I could have a shooter/backup and another as a low round count proven carry pistol.
From what I've gathered the main problem areas for durability are the locking block and takedown lever? I know the combat version of the takedown lever is reinforced supposedly being more durable. Also I've read that it's prudent to keep the recoil and magazine springs fresh to maintain the feed reliability.
If I were to religiously change out my springs and keep up replacing broken takedown levers/locking blocks when they occur would that be sufficient to use the pistol to high round counts? And by high round counts I mean 30-50k.
Also, I really like the stainless framed P220's. I understand the theory of the lack of frame flex in the steel frame vs the aluminum alloy frames, causing the takedown levers and locking blocks to break earlier. What I'm really asking in regards to the P220 frame material is if it's necessary from a durability standpoint in reference to the frame to get a steel frame?
As long as the slide/frame/barrel have sufficient durability I don't mind having to replace a takedown lever or locking block here or there.
Thanks in advance for the P220 durability experiences/knowledge.