So why did you leave Beretta and where did you go?I do indeed see that photo, and in my experience thatÂ’s a monumentally bad idea if you are running the gun seriously for defensive purposes with a +2 extension. IÂ’m not just saying to use a clamp because IÂ’m being a pain in the ass on the internet, IÂ’ve seen what happens without them during intensive use. As for gamers running without clamps? IÂ’m glad it works for them. IÂ’d never do that on a gun I rely on for defensive purposes. As for Beretta saying that, thatÂ’s a new one on me, I wrote the copy for the website and most marketing material on the gun, so if itÂ’s out there thatÂ’s new since I left the company in 2021. 3 shells or less would generally refer to a plug, not a barrel clamp. Would you please post a link to that statement?
As for the coating, I donÂ’t disagree. I know that during the last two years many companies had QA/QC issues for a variety of reasons (Beretta included) and prep is a labor intensive thing for both cerakote and ATS. If the prep wasnÂ’t done right it will have problems.
Now, regarding field strip times, the 7 shot tube does not require the clamp to be exceedingly tight because the purpose for the clamp with a +2 is to prevent the end cap and extension spinning off. As the clamp on the polymer 7 shot tube sleeve is not used to prevent that because the mag tube is one piece, it is there to allow for attachment of accessories and serves as an extra safety layer to prevent that sleeve from backing off (which isnÂ’t as common because or the below reasons). You donÂ’t need to tighten it as much as you do with a Nordic or other +2. ThereÂ’s a reason itÂ’s polymer while the others are aluminum. I would personally run one because it is smarter to have an extra layer of security, but unlike the +2s which have a tendency to spin off as the follower transitions between the +2 and the standard mag tube, this has no break in the tube and the sleeve wonÂ’t come loose from the detent because there is almost no stress on it.