Originally Posted by
SLG
Though I happen to agree with the above (mostly) I will say that Siddle has some, ahem, interesting, ideas on what constitutes research, as well as some bizarre conclusions that are not supported by the reality that I've seen. A few years ago, after a teammate and I talked to him for about 5 minutes, and explained that everyone we worked with was capable of doing things that he said were physically impossible under stress, he then said something like, "Well, my research is for the average person, not guys who train as much as you do." He also said that Rob Leatham was an exception as well, so I took that as a compliment:-) If there are all these exceptions, why say it isn't possible? What's the value in that?