So is the administration's position on Benghazi and Fast & Furious. That didnt stop the press from reporting it.;)Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD
So is the administration's position on Benghazi and Fast & Furious. That didnt stop the press from reporting it.;)Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD
Ditto that and a funny yet sad way to put it....Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyGBiv
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
I don't think Christie should be worried about his Nomination, cause there's no way he will ever sit in the WH. He's worse than McCain...I would rather vote for Hillary.
For the record I would never pull the lever for that person. As much as I think voting for the 3rd party is a waste of a vote in todays climate, I'd rather waste my vote. She'd still win unfortunately but maybe someone will start getting the message, unlikely but maybe.Quote:
Originally Posted by John Ralston
Ok I found what is purported to be the actual changes in the transportation language. It does contain language for meal breaks.
http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2014/Bi...000/989_I1.PDF
I still don't support the agreement since we will have to divest ourselves of our currently lawfully owned property and puts the gun owner at a disadvantage in a self defense situation. And for what; them giving us what we already had. The transportation language is only a clarification of intent of the law.
From the Bill:
"SYNOPSIS
Clarifies definition of reasonably necessary deviation when legally
transporting firearm or weapon in motor vehicle."
ETA: Also there is no guarantee that Christy won't sign the magazine limit bill and veto the transportation bill. The only way to ensure that won't happen is if they go to his desk as one bill.
I'd vote for Satan himself before Hillary if they weren't the same entity.Quote:
Originally Posted by John Ralston
I'm with you on that...Quote:
Originally Posted by Suvorov
Doubtful. I don't think Satan's ever lied to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suvorov
Can't say the same for the Hillary.
Latest news on this front is that despite what I have been told was overwhelming testimony against these measures, the state assembly has passed both these bills. The state senate is expected to follow suit shortly. http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf...magazines.html I see no Grandfather clause (not that I expected there to be given NJ's history to outright ban) and you have 3 months to get rid of the magazines you own from the time the bill is enacted.
BTW I shoot with the 9 year old at some of the matches I attend. To date I have only seen her shoot a Walther 22. http://www.nepaidpascores.net/sjidpa/2013-09-14.htm When I last saw her, her dad was talking about purchasing a 9mm for her. For a nine year old she is quite impressive in her attitude, demeanor and dedication.
The lone bright spot in all this was reasonable necessary stops to and from the range or hunting field clarification. Unfortunately the version that is being trotted out now leaves out stops for food making it a non starter in my book. http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2014/Bi...00/2777_I1.HTM Look for the section that is underlined in the body of the text for the new wording or go directly to the bottom of the page to the Statement section.
Call and write your state senators and cross your fingers.
At this time I'm afraid the senate will pass these bills as well and send them to Christie's desk. I own opinion is that he will look to CO and veto the magazine ban and sign the transportation bill. HE will tout how the new transportation wording is good for gun owners and that he vetoed the mag limit bill.
Sadly you are probably right on all accounts. Emails, letters and phone calls have done nothing, but I'm going back to it tomorrow anyway.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk