1 Attachment(s)
Practice what you suck at...
Rant Follows:
I have been shooting seriously since 1991. IPSC, USPSA, IDPA (from a tactical v competitive winning POV) and qualifying with client local/state/federal agencies. I have attended multiple sleep away classes and trained at Gunsite, Thunder Ranch with Clint Smith, EAG with Pat Rogers, Rangemaster with Tom Givens, Pistol-Training with our founder, Todd Louis Green, Cumberland Tactics with Randy Cain etc.
You would think that after all these years I would reject the warm, loving embrace of practicing what I am good at for the cold harsh reality of practicing what I suck at.
30 years into this party, I still suck at practicing what I suck at.
Yesterday, I "qualified" at a client agency range 3x. This is the first time I have live fired since 5/28/21. I shot 100% on the day qual x2 and 99% on a "night" qual.
In order to have a "distinguished" all rounds fired at the "body" must impact in a 5 x 8 rectangle and all head shots in the "t-box".
The 50 rd course of fire is from 15 yrds to 1 yrd and back out to 7. 13 of the 50 rounds fired are from the 15, behind a baricade, from the low ready ( 5 rounds in 6 seconds, 4 rounds in 5 secs,
3 rounds in 4 secs and 1 round in 2 seconds). The targets turn for all timed evolutions.
While I kept all my rounds in the 2 pt section, 7 of 13 rounds did not impact in the 5x8 at 15 yrds. This is not a new "issue". I have notes going back on this for 11+years and yet I continue to do nothing in a systematic fashion to address the issue.
Gun used was a G35 shooting 180 g Lawman. Spartan Operator Ameriglos. G35 has an OEM 5.5 TRS with the "-" connector.
Please practice what you suck at. Please seek qualified help in doing so as needed. That is all.
Rant off.
Attachment 78305
Define "suck" and why call it "suck?"
@JCS
@BWT
@vcdgrips
@Moylan
I understand my thoughts and philosophy aren't necessarily shared by most on the board.
I don't find judging oneself negatively or using terms with negative connotations is helpful.
There is no "suck." It's just the level of ability and proficiency you possess at any given time.
Then the extension of it is: What is your acceptable proficiency and are you willing to put in the work to attain it?
That's one of the reasons I started USPSA and loved their classifier database.
It gives you objective performance standards to judge yourself by. Each classifier tests slightly different abilities and you can tease out different skill set assessment by testing yourself with various classifiers.
Are you a B shooter with standard draws and transitions? But a D shooter weak hand and a C shooter at speed with reloads? You can work on your D and C skills to bring them up to B level.
But these published famous non-competition practical shooting drills / tests lack cohesion in standardization of scoring and ability.
Some "pass" at a C level shooter. Some "pass" at a B. Some like the old Federal Air Marshal COF or getting 100% on Bakersfield are probably about an A level.
So people wind up judging themself based on an inconsistent metric, which is like trying to judge your ability based on a local match standing.
Use the most robust database to get the best data. Judge where your skill is at and ask yourself sans ego if you care to put in the work to improve deficient parts.
IMO.