This has a listed 3 MOA adjustment per click, which equates to .628 inch at 20 yards. RMSC has .25 inch adjustment at the same distance for reference.
Printable View
This has a listed 3 MOA adjustment per click, which equates to .628 inch at 20 yards. RMSC has .25 inch adjustment at the same distance for reference.
Proprietary footprint (wont fit Glock or Sig)
Bottom loading battery
Requires additional sealing plate
Base is taller than the Shield/HS, which means that co-witnessing with standard height sights may not be possible.
Keeping the RMR's poor window position. RMRs work better the closer they are to your face (on a rifle). Some of the window is obscured when it's on a pistol farther out in front of your face.
Mounting options overview snipped from the product support sheet posted on the Trijicon web site:
https://www.trijicon.com/uploads/pro...pec_Sheet..pdf
Attachment 59735
I know exactly nothing about why optics are built the way they are. And I know the RMR wasn’t originally designed for handguns, people just figured out how to mount them on slides. But it seems like Trijicon could’ve made an accessible battery a consideration for new designs. Especially seeing how everybody else has one (including themselves). Removing and rezeroing your RMR is hardly difficult, but could be avoided.
Well, that didn’t take long:
https://chpws.com/product/glock-mos-...trijicon-rmrcc
Agree on all counts, but they aren’t automatically fails for me. The height is my biggest concern - some of the photos I’ve seen of the compact Shield on a 48 MOS sure make it look like the factory sights are usable as a backup. I really want to avoid suppressor height sights on a 43.
For sale currently: https://www.kenziesoptics.com/produc...e97761f17ea373
$529.99