Brownell reticle VS NF 1-4
The two different reticles are similar. The Brownell's is a cruder version in my opinion. To bad in doesn't come in a standard duplex. I really like Japanese scopes. My Bushnell's have been great.
Brownell
https://cdn-fsly.yottaa.net/53ff2f50....jpg?yocs=p_E_
Night Force
https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.Nmi4ld...r=1.25&pid=1.7
1 Attachment(s)
Brownell reticle VS NF 1-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HCM
They say the inspiration is the AUG reticle but this reticle reminds me more of the night force FCG 2.
I plan to try one of these. In my experience the AUG donut and the FCG 2 work better as a carbine optic then one might think.
I have been using a NF 1-4 with the FCG 2 reticle for about two years on LMT 16 and 14.5 ARs. It is a great scope and fast to use. I shoot at paper and steel targets. It's a shame that it was discontinued for general sales because it is a great alternative to the ACOG in my opinion. I usually shoot at 100-200 yards but have shot past 300 yards and don't have much trouble hitting steel plates the size of a sheet of paper of slightly larger.
I have a SB Short Dot on another carbine and for the money, I think the Night Force is a great optic. They would have sold more if the price could have been brought down. I paid $1,600 for mine new after the scope was discontinued and still feel it was money well spent.