Originally Posted by
Erick Gelhaus
Blues, it was a question as to what their issue was. Don't have an opinion on this one, nowhere near enough information out there.
I asked if the round count drove the grand jury's decision making. Regardless of what the L/E and Mil communities have come to understand about the number of actual hits it may take to stop someone (never mind the number of shots it takes to get those hits), the public and many attorneys do not (will not?) understand those issues. "THey" have bought into one or two rounds should be sufficient to end the fight.
It's a fascinating subject. On one hand, I hear significant L/E and citizen firearms trainers talking about keeping the number of shots low and then I read, hear Mil instructors talking about how the shooting program at the SF schoolhouse evolved from a physical platform that worked for two rounds to one that worked for ten rounds. That happened, per them, because they found they needed to hit people a lot more than they had thought.