I wanted to add in my reading to clarify my positions taken in preceding posts, I came across an interesting distinction in case law relating to your scenario. The courts make a large distinction between personal property and business property. Personal property has a much higher threshold for taking versus other property. Business property has much less protection, so it would make your scenario more plausible. Basically business property is just money in another form. If the government takes it, they just convert it back into money by paying you for it. Personal property, by its very nature, is less likely to be converted back into money. I'm not advocating this in any way, but the case law does open the door to this sort of taking.
Here's the article from Harvard professor of law:
https://scholar.harvard.edu/jsinger/...sonal-property