Originally Posted by
David C.
You and BBI keep saying there is reasonable doubt. The server existed. The emails were redirected there. It is not like she could argue she forgot to remove a file from her briefcase when she left the office for the day. So, how is there any reasonable doubt?
Also, there is no requirement to establish intent or gross negligence in order to prosecute under UCMJ. Simply leaving TS SCI files on your desk or in a locked desk (rather than an approved safe) is enough to convict. Are you telling me 18 USC is different?
Regarding Alberto Gonzales (the Republican AG as you first referred to him), I don't care if his imminence the Pope breaks the law, prosecute him. You are proposing exactly what I described earlier as fuck-fuck games. We are supposed to be equal under the law.
I do not understand how you believe Gonzales and Petraeus committed more egregious violations, because the true scope of the Clinton intelligence breach has not been publicly defined. The assumption has to be that while her illegal server was up and running that all communications to that server were compromised and found their way to foreign intelligence services.
That multiple actors, from both parties, continue to leak and misdirect TS and TS SCI information is disgusting. That no administration, no DOJ, and no Congress has had the will to stop it is disappointing. It has hurt intelligence and military operations overseas by compromising means and methods, etc. It has cost lives, and it will cost many additional lives in the future. It has to stop.