That's a bizarre interpretation of history. The "course of fire" was two very common training & evaluation drills. The guns were the guns being discussed in the thread. You're continuing to equivocate and use "revolver" for whatever strikes your fancy at a given moment in the discussion. But we're not talking about magically pulling your most perfectly optimized gun out of thin air when you need it. If you're going to tell people the j-frame is enough over and over again, then why isn't that a perfectly fair gun to test against things like a G19 that other people are saying tips their enough meter?
Have. No problem. Expensive, but beyond the wallet no pain. An LCP has very, very little recoil compared to a comparable lightweight j-frame shooting typical self-defense ammo and certainly it's nowhere near as punishing as shooting .357s through one. It's also got more rounds, a trigger that is easier for most people to shoot accurately at speed under stress, it's faster to reload, and spare ammo is even easier to carry because it's smaller, less bulky, and lighter.Quote:
I'm sure it is. Go practice a couple hundred rounds with a Ruger LCP and let me know how comfortable that is.
Being able to shoot what I carry is important to me. You're the one cherry picking. I'm sticking with exactly one gun for all occasions.Quote:
Again, you seem to be wanting to cherry-pick extreme examples. If being able to shoot hundreds of rounds at a time without pain/injury is important to you don't use a .357 Mag in a LW gun.
Where did I say that, David?Quote:
As opposed to saying that any random autoloader is "good enough for CCW" is not diving down the same rabbit hole??