JonInWA
07-31-2023, 07:22 PM
No one hear is likely to accuse JonInWA as being an early adopter. However, after recently winning a Glock gun certificate at a local GSSF match, I decided it was best applied to a Gen5, so I could personally experience the changes and improvements first-hand (I will admit to being initially tempted to go the G30 route, but held off...)
Despite the high level of satisfaction here among p-f members regarding the G45, I have perfectly functioning Gen 3 G17 and G19, so for an initial Gen5 foray, the G45 would be somewhat superfluous for me. Lwt16's experiences and recommendation regard his G45 was influential, though-perhaps in the future.
I considered getting one of the Gen5 G22s; some 20 years after the fact, Glock finally did The Right Thing and increased the slide mass, essentially marrying the GAP slide with the .40 chambering-something HK discovered ideal with the .40 cartridge some time back-that you need a combination of slide mass and tuned springing, not just revised springing to best service the .40 cartridge. However, I've got a Gen4 G22 (also a GSSF winning), and while the Gen5 is an improved platform, I also have the Glock .357 SIG for it, and there's probably not a very high likelihood of Glock coming out with a Glock Gen5 .357 SIG platform/barrel, and my satisfaction is high with the Gen4, and my relative low actual usage of it (by p-f standards, anyhow) doesn't really warrant significant reasons to replace it with a new Gen5 G22.
So-the G23 in Gen5 became my choice. GJM's laudatory discussion thread of his satisfaction with it was a huge point in my selection process. Mine will be a non-MOS version, although I may apply a Leupold DeltaPoint Micro RDS to it. Irons will likely be a set of Warren Tacticals.
Now the waiting begins...
Best, Jon
Despite the high level of satisfaction here among p-f members regarding the G45, I have perfectly functioning Gen 3 G17 and G19, so for an initial Gen5 foray, the G45 would be somewhat superfluous for me. Lwt16's experiences and recommendation regard his G45 was influential, though-perhaps in the future.
I considered getting one of the Gen5 G22s; some 20 years after the fact, Glock finally did The Right Thing and increased the slide mass, essentially marrying the GAP slide with the .40 chambering-something HK discovered ideal with the .40 cartridge some time back-that you need a combination of slide mass and tuned springing, not just revised springing to best service the .40 cartridge. However, I've got a Gen4 G22 (also a GSSF winning), and while the Gen5 is an improved platform, I also have the Glock .357 SIG for it, and there's probably not a very high likelihood of Glock coming out with a Glock Gen5 .357 SIG platform/barrel, and my satisfaction is high with the Gen4, and my relative low actual usage of it (by p-f standards, anyhow) doesn't really warrant significant reasons to replace it with a new Gen5 G22.
So-the G23 in Gen5 became my choice. GJM's laudatory discussion thread of his satisfaction with it was a huge point in my selection process. Mine will be a non-MOS version, although I may apply a Leupold DeltaPoint Micro RDS to it. Irons will likely be a set of Warren Tacticals.
Now the waiting begins...
Best, Jon