PDA

View Full Version : Reproduction Stoner 63 upper?



awp_101
02-21-2021, 12:10 PM
During a search for something else I thought I ran across someone other than Robinson Arms making a Stoner 63-like upper for standard AR lowers. Of course that wasn't what I was researching at the time and now that I'm curious about it I can't find anything.

Did I hallucinate it?

Sig_Fiend
02-21-2021, 01:24 PM
Not sure but, if you weren't in incognito mode, try to remember roughly what time of day you saw it and check your browser history.

Caballoflaco
02-21-2021, 01:40 PM
During a search for something else I thought I ran across someone other than Robinson Arms making a Stoner 63-like upper for standard AR lowers. Of course that wasn't what I was researching at the time and now that I'm curious about it I can't find anything.

Did I hallucinate it?

You aren’t misremembering the ar180 upper that brownells is making are you?

https://www.brownells.com/rifle-parts/receiver-parts/receivers/upper-receivers/brn-180-gen-2-complete-upper-receiver-assembly-prod137282.aspx


https://youtu.be/w6fn0QfO9fg

awp_101
02-21-2021, 02:09 PM
Not sure but, if you weren't in incognito mode, try to remember roughly what time of day you saw it and check your browser history.
That’s the problem, I didn’t follow the link when I saw it and so far I haven’t seen it again using the same search terms.


You aren’t misremembering the ar180 upper that brownells is making are you?

No, but that’s a player if/when I get a few more things sorted out rifle-wise.

HCM
02-21-2021, 06:26 PM
During a search for something else I thought I ran across someone other than Robinson Arms making a Stoner 63-like upper for standard AR lowers. Of course that wasn't what I was researching at the time and now that I'm curious about it I can't find anything.

Did I hallucinate it?

Are you talking about a belt fed upper?

There was a Stoner 63ish belt fed upper for AR’s called the Shrike - in short they were very problematic and best avoided.

call_me_ski
02-21-2021, 06:44 PM
Are you talking about a belt fed upper?

There was a Stoner 63ish belt fed upper for AR’s called the Shrike - in short they were very problematic and best avoided.

Did they ever get them running right at the fightlite MCR?

HCM
02-21-2021, 06:53 PM
Did they ever get them running right at the fightlite MCR?

I don’t have a transferable M16 lower so I lost internet a long time ago.

awp_101
02-21-2021, 07:34 PM
Nope, not a Shrike or MCR. Whatever I saw said reproduction Stoner 63 but at this point it's entirely possible I dreamed the whole thing.

Tokarev
02-22-2021, 09:17 PM
Here is what you want...

https://www.brpguns.com/xmg-belt-fed-ar-15-m16-upper-receiver/

Paul D
02-22-2021, 09:23 PM
Here is what you want...

https://www.brpguns.com/xmg-belt-fed-ar-15-m16-upper-receiver/

Hmmm, weird. It said it cannot be used on a transferable M16 unless a C2 manufacturer, but semi-auto is okay.

awp_101
02-22-2021, 10:36 PM
Hmmm, weird. It said it cannot be used on a transferable M16 unless a C2 manufacturer, but semi-auto is okay.

Yeah, I’m curious as to their reasoning on that because...
https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/54528936.jpg

CleverNickname
02-23-2021, 01:42 AM
Yeah, I’m curious as to their reasoning on that because...
https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/54528936.jpg
The ATF has classified the BRP upper as a title I firearm. So their reasoning is that if a non-C2 takes the BRP upper and makes it full-auto (even by using a transferable M16), then they've created a post-86 machine gun. In comparison, the Fightlite MCR/Shrike is not classified as a firearm, so anyone can attach it to a transferable M16 and it's no different legally than attaching any other upper.

I believe the reason why the ATF classified the BRP upper as a title I firearm is because the BRP's recoil system is part of the upper, and the lower is just a glorified trigger pack. The MCR/Shrike uses the regular receiver extension and buffer just like any other normal upper.

awp_101
02-23-2021, 10:19 AM
I believe the reason why the ATF classified the BRP upper as a title I firearm is because the BRP's recoil system is part of the upper, and the lower is just a glorified trigger pack
Interesting. I can think of a couple of other conversions that seem to meet that criteria.

Lester Polfus
02-23-2021, 10:25 AM
Is it possible that you saw Robinson Arms announcement that they are re-introducing their Stoner 63 clone? (Because it will be different this time.)

That's a complete rifle, and not an upper, but it was announced early last year they were making another go at it.