PDA

View Full Version : Autoloaders- what to get?



Joe in PNG
11-12-2011, 07:58 AM
More pondering about what to get. I want a good, reliable autoloader that I could take to a class (or not). I'm also fond of the idea of shooting often but not spending a ton on ammo. And so...

1) The Sensible choice: a Colt 6920

2) The Sensable cheap choice: an Arsenal SLG 21-71 AK or Czechpoint VZ 58 in 7.62

3) The Slightly Silly party: a Springfield M1A

4) The Silly Party: a DSA Imbel FAL

5) The Very Silly Party: Something by Century....

JAD
11-12-2011, 08:04 AM
I've been very pleased with my SOCOM16. I like my AR, but the SOCOM fills the same role and is a lot more fun.

Al T.
11-12-2011, 08:43 AM
Most classes are oriented towards the AR. Showing up with an AK would mean that the TTPs the instructor teaches would have to be skewed to fit your equipment. There are classes that are not platform intense, but you'd have to look for them.


What you think the rifle's mission or role will be should drive the decision making process IMHO.

agent-smith
11-12-2011, 09:19 AM
Pretty hard to go wrong with a 6920.

If you want a cool-guy rail go with a 6940 or a BCM mid-length.

Tamara
11-12-2011, 11:04 AM
The only reason to use something other than a quality DI AR-pattern carbine is to "make a personality statement" about how you "don't follow the crowd".

You can do that a lot more cheaply with bumper stickers than you can with an HK91 or an NFA Krink clone. ;)

Jay Cunningham
11-12-2011, 11:05 AM
Sensible choice is sensible.

Kevin B.
11-12-2011, 11:59 AM
Colt 6920.

Joe in PNG
11-12-2011, 03:32 PM
I ask this for those times during a late night online gunshop crawl when that little voice* tells me "Ya know, a Century C-93 Limbim-Bustop-Biscuit-Barrel could be the kewl way to go, and you want to be kewl and different (peng!)"


*Sounds like Michael Palin.

SecondsCount
11-12-2011, 03:33 PM
6920 would be a good choice but I like midlengths better and is currently what I run. BCM is an excellent choice.

This year I started playing with AK's in 5.45. Lots of cheap fun but on long shots I find myself missing the accuracy of the AR.

The M1A and FAL are big heavy rifles that compared to the other choices are expensive to feed.

Stay away from Century.

fuse
11-12-2011, 04:16 PM
6920 would be a good choice but I like midlengths better and is currently what I run. BCM is an excellent choice.

This. For a 14.5-16 inch barrel, in my very humble opinion the carbine gas system is obsolete.

The lower is largely irrelevant.

I would buy an upper from BCM or DD. Buy one without handguards and add as per your preference.

Suvorov
11-13-2011, 01:02 AM
I ask this for those times during a late night online gunshop crawl when that little voice* tells me "Ya know, a Century C-93 Limbim-Bustop-Biscuit-Barrel could be the kewl way to go, and you want to be kewl and different (peng!)"


*Sounds like Michael Palin.

I certainly appreciate the Python Election Day Coverage references. :)

For what my opinion is worth, while I love the M14 pattern rifle, it is really really hard to beat a quality AR for general (a little bit of everything but big game hunting) use.

Failure2Stop
11-14-2011, 09:49 AM
A Colt 6920 used to be my default answer, but I now think that there are a few other options out there that exceed the 6920 in delivered capability.

The DD M4 V1 is great: https://danieldefense.com/rifles/daniel-defense-m4-carbine-v1.html
Has a pinned FSB, extended rail for lights and extended grip. The carbine gas system might be a little harder hitting than a middie, but it does work well now that we have over 30 years of improvement to the system, as would the 6920 anyway.
You will pay about $300 more than a 6920 today, but you're getting a rail, a good BUIS, and a VFG.
There are other great options (best time so far for the AR platform) as pointed out by others, and there is no need to +1 all of them.

I keep flirting with the idea of getting another AK (I launched mine several years ago), but the prices of a decent one (avoid Century) rival that of a quality AR. The AK platform is capable, but lags behind in ergos and standardized support that I look for in a "service" firearm.

The M14/M1A is an overrated platform. I would much rather go with a FAL, G3, or modern 7.62 AR if going that route.

P30shtr
11-15-2011, 10:49 PM
1st thing I thought was shotguns when reading the thread title. You dont usually hear of rifles referred to as auto-loaders. Back on topic, I really like my SGL. Although ALL are good choices. I think it basically comes down to what you'll be able to afford to practice/train with the most. Give or take $$ wise they are all pretty close for the initial investment. Then comes the ammo to feed said choice.

I guess for me it would either be the AR or the AK (ammo being the cheapest, allowing the most practice)

LOKNLOD
11-15-2011, 11:27 PM
I agree with F2S (unusual, I know...) about the DDM4 option. I think it's one of the best options going for a turnkey setup. The V5 is an option if one is dead-set on midlength system, as well. An AK makes an interesting and fun 2nd or 3rd rifle; but it's harder to make a logical justification for it over an AR unless there are extenuating circumstances.

Joe in PNG
11-16-2011, 01:10 AM
Well, I am trying to keep things under $1,100- a thousand before I get more mags, ect would be best.
As for red dots, lights, ect, it will likely be years before I put anything of the sort on the rifle- I'm going to be running irons for a good while, and want a good set.
Another thing, I really hate recoil- so it's likely any .308 battle rifles types. An M-4 variant will likely be my best bet. DD and Bravo may be kind of tough to find in Central Florida/ Orlando area, but it will be fun to check around.

zml342
11-16-2011, 06:33 AM
For an out of the box, good-to-go rifle you can't beat Colt, BCM, DD or Noveske. And if you shop around you could get a great deal for any of these brands (especially if you buy the upper/lower seperately). I have seen a few decent reports about Palmetto State Armory's complete Patrol Carbine (http://palmettostatearmory.com/2557.php). The build looks to be solid, however I don't have any first hand knowledge of how it handles and the reports I have seen have been no more than a few thousand rounds through it. If you're looking for a starter rifle, for $1000 (optic included) it looks like a good deal.

If anyone has any more experience with them (good/bad) let me know.

JConn
11-16-2011, 08:25 AM
For an out of the box, good-to-go rifle you can't beat Colt, BCM, DD or Noveske. And if you shop around you could get a great deal for any of these brands (especially if you buy the upper/lower seperately). I have seen a few decent reports about Palmetto State Armory's complete Patrol Carbine (http://palmettostatearmory.com/2557.php). The build looks to be solid, however I don't have any first hand knowledge of how it handles and the reports I have seen have been no more than a few thousand rounds through it. If you're looking for a starter rifle, for $1000 (optic included) it looks like a good deal.

If anyone has any more experience with them (good/bad) let me know.

Man if those work that is a smoking deal. Although if it's too good to be true....

Al T.
11-16-2011, 09:39 AM
If anyone has any more experience with them (good/bad) let me know.

I don't own one and don't work for PSA, but do know the guys there fairly well.

There is a good cross over between FN and PSA. I know PSA is using some barrels from FN (hammer forged) and the same vendors for some of their parts. Assembly is in house. Parts are staked correctly from the several I've examined. Several of the local shooters are using the PR with no issues. While I don't think it's a top tier rifle, I'd rate it above Bushmaster/RRA/Stag/DPMS crowd.

Joe in PNG
11-19-2011, 06:13 PM
I'm liking the looks of this Daniel Defence M-4 I spotted here (http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/2DDDA20010NS-1.html)...

Chris_S
11-19-2011, 11:36 PM
I'm liking the looks of this Daniel Defence M-4 I spotted here (http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/2DDDA20010NS-1.html)...

I got one of those V7s as a first AR about two months ago and I'm very happy with it. I've only had a chance to put about 300 rounds through it but it feels great and has run without a hitch. The float tube is pretty narrow, so it's easy to get a good, firm grip on, though it does get really hot in a hurry. Three mags of ammo in 20 minutes meant I was having trouble comfortably holding the fore-end of the rifle, so you may want to invest in a pair of mechanix gloves in case your hands are baby sensitive as mine seem to be. I have a set of Troy sights on it that are great, especially with the very long sight radius that the MFR gives you. It's a heck of a rifle for this new AR owner and the guys at my shop were eye banging the hell out of it when I picked it up. No complaints from this neophyte owner. (You'd also be lucky and get the thing for $100 less than I did from Rifle Gear, as well. Since it doesn't say that it's coming with those sights installed, ask before ordering so you don't get blue-balled by getting a gun with no sights.)

Joe in PNG
12-15-2011, 04:03 PM
Follow up- I went for the Colt 6920, which I should be getting in a few weeks.

Tamara
12-15-2011, 07:04 PM
Follow up- I went for the Colt 6920, which I should be getting in a few weeks.

You have snatched the pebble, Brasshopper, now go and walk the earf. *gong!* ;)

Al T.
12-15-2011, 09:52 PM
getting in a few weeks

In PNG? :confused:

Joe in PNG
12-15-2011, 10:26 PM
In PNG? :confused:

I wish! No, I'm getting ready to head back to the US, so I ordered it in advance of my return.

Al T.
12-16-2011, 09:10 AM
Ah. Thanks!

seabiscuit
12-17-2011, 12:19 PM
I got one of those V7s as a first AR about two months ago and I'm very happy with it. I've only had a chance to put about 300 rounds through it but it feels great and has run without a hitch. The float tube is pretty narrow, so it's easy to get a good, firm grip on, though it does get really hot in a hurry. Three mags of ammo in 20 minutes meant I was having trouble comfortably holding the fore-end of the rifle, so you may want to invest in a pair of mechanix gloves in case your hands are baby sensitive as mine seem to be. I have a set of Troy sights on it that are great, especially with the very long sight radius that the MFR gives you. It's a heck of a rifle for this new AR owner and the guys at my shop were eye banging the hell out of it when I picked it up. No complaints from this neophyte owner. (You'd also be lucky and get the thing for $100 less than I did from Rifle Gear, as well. Since it doesn't say that it's coming with those sights installed, ask before ordering so you don't get blue-balled by getting a gun with no sights.)

Have you had any difficulty indexing your support hand on that forend?

Chris_S
12-17-2011, 04:17 PM
Have you had any difficulty indexing your support hand on that forend?

I'm a new enough shooter that I'd be lying if I claimed to be doing anything that tested reliable or repeated indexing of the grip, so take the following response as being of dubious value. As it is setup out of the box, there may be indexing issues since it's a thin tube with movable rail sections. The movable rail sections that come from the factory are at the end of the rail at the 3, 6, and 9 o'clock positions and, at least for me, that feels just a little longer than is comfortable to grasp. I am inclined, having read a lot and shot not nearly so much, to move the bottom rail piece back a few inches and put a handstop, like the Larue one, on it so that it makes a point that I can comfortably and repeatedly get a grip. The tube is thin enough so that something like an afg isn't needed. Daniel Defense sells the rail sections individually if you needed more, though I think the three sections on there are probably all that's needed for a light, sling attachment, and a handstop.

seabiscuit
12-17-2011, 04:44 PM
Thanks. Not sure I understand your point about not needing an afg on the things tube. Why would you need one on a thicker tube as opposed to a thin one?

Also worried about the heat issue you mentioned.