SansSouci
06-05-2016, 12:30 PM
I believe that the end game of unpatriotic traitors of the United States Constitution is deleting the Second Amendment from our constitution. The ultimate end game is the New World Order, AKA: one-world-government. Our Second Amendment is the only obstacle preventing politicians from officially telling us that the country created by our Founding Fathers no longer exists, that we are satellite state of a one-world-government.
The players of the end game can't do it with one act of legislation; however, the supreme court can opine that the Second Amendment doesn't mean what Madison meant, which would be an injustice, an act that the court has perfected. Absent an anti-Second Amendment majority, congress proceeds incrementally: one little law at a time until de facto gun confiscation occurs. And this will happen. We saw it happen during Hurricane Katrina when citizens most needed their guns. The government practiced gun confiscation during an operation in Arcadia, IA. Officials running the plan to commit the unconstitutional act of confiscating our lawfully owned property that is protected by the Second Amendment tried to spin it. However, those in Arcadia knew exactly what was happening. Governmental agents were practicing confiscating Americans' lawfully owned guns: http://www.infowars.com/iowa-national-guard-to-train-for-gun-confiscation/ BTW, I first heard of this illegal operation from a friend who lives in Iowa who told me about it. He told me that it was a gun confiscation exercise, not anything other.
There is no doubt in my mind that our federal government has an operational plan to disarm Americans. Recently, Obama said as much under the auspices of martial law.
When I was a cop, other cops and I knew that we would not be exempt from gun confiscation. As far as I know, we're the only country that allows off-duty and honorably retired cops to carry handguns. Our brethren in Canada have to leave their guns in their lockers when 10-7. I wouldn't be surprised to see a law that prevents cops from carrying their guns while off-duty.
If we know the end game, we can predict anti-Second Amendment radicals' tactics. Like the unconstitutional Roe decision (Google Scholar: Bork Roe), which accorded congress ability to defer their constitutional mandate of legislation to the court thus according them ability to run from legislation legalizing the murder of the most innocent among us, congress would prefer the court to opine that the Second Amendment doesn't mean what Madison meant. That way it could escape accountability for destroying our Second Amendment, which would be a spurious argument.
Our Founding Fathers did not intend the Supreme Court to be equal to the two most important branches of government. The Supreme Court does not mete out justice. It metes out political agenda. If this were not true, if law and justice were controlling, political party affiliation would be immaterial. Another important consideration is the fallacy of Republicans are conservatives. Bush 41 & Bush 43 were Republicans. They were not conservatives. In fact, when liberals jam me about how badly Bush 43 screwed up our country, my reply is, "Why are you jamming me? Bush 43 was one of you guys, a liberal." We now know for certain that Romney is who we knew was in '12, which was why conservatives refused to support him.
Off of the top of my head, Samuel Chase was the last Supreme Court justice to have been impeached and removed. This is a very sad commentary of our legislative process. Does congress really want me to believe that since the late 18th or early 19th century, there has been only one justice impeached? Taney, after his Dred Scott decision, should've been impeached. Taney's objective, a Democrat, was to undermine Lincoln's presidential campaign platform. His decision had zero to do with justice. Warren Burger should have been impeached for his Roe. Earl Warren should have been impeached for routinely usurping congress's constitutional authority and blatant disregard for our constitution. Hugo Black should've been impeached for Everson. All seven justices in Plessy should have been impeached. So why did congress protect activist supreme court justices? Because they were patsies for congress. Congress needed them in order to insulate themselves from rebuke for unconstitutional decisions.
I do expect to see gun confiscation in my lifetime. Cops will not be exempt. They'll be issued guns upon going 10-8 and return them to agencies' armorers upon 10-7. However, America's ruling elite and those whom protect them will be exempt from gun confiscation. They will keep their guns. The rest of us will have our private property confiscated.
This is the absolute best treatise I've read that definitively explicates how America is ruled by a cartel of elites that feign affiliation with Democratic and Republican parties. They eat, drink, socialize, and sleep together: http://spectator.org/39326_americas-ruling-class-and-perils-revolution/ There is a reason why GOP elites, power brokers, and insiders are deathly afraid of a Trump presidency. Most frightened seem to be the Bush Cartel. What secrets are they afraid of being revealed to President Trump? I didn't know until recently that Nancy Reagan believed that Bush 41 was involved in President Reagan's assassination attempt. She was probably right. Bush 41 should have been done for murder during WWII: http://whowhatwhy.org/2014/09/02/an-enduring-mystery-about-bush-41s-wwii-escape-from-death/ Bush 41 has also been implicated in the murder of JFK. Family of Secrets exposed the Bush Cartel's crimes: http://www.amazon.com/Family-Secrets-Americas-Invisible-Government/dp/1608190064/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1465146710&sr=1-1&keywords=family+of+secrets
We, the People are no longer sovereign as our Founding Fathers intended:
"There is hardly a part of the United States where men are not aware that secret private purposes and interests have been running the government."
---US President Woodrow Wilson---
We are ruled. We haven't been governed since the Federal Reserve Act. The Federal Reserve Act has stripped Americans of individual liberties that are deemed dangerous to America's ruling elite. We, the People must regain control of our government. We can't blame politicians for confiscating our Guns. We have to blame ourselves for voting for traitors. Bush 43 said that he'd of signed Brady Bill renewing legislation if congress had presented it to him. His daddy did sign gun control legislation. We must not be duped by the false assumption that Republicans will protect our Second Amendment, for they are within America's ruling elite.
If you know what's likely to occur, you can prepare. Look for an excuse for a declaration of martial law. The excuse could be real or phony. The intent is to create an excuse to confiscate our guns. Then think about how federal agents could accomplish their plan. Going door-to-door is probably their last tactic. Rather, the feds would prefer that we voluntarily turn in our guns. So how could it convince us to turn in our guns? If anyone has studied Stalin's forced famine that killed tens of millions or the Iranian Holocaust that exterminated up to half of its population, we can make valid predictions. The most practical method of absolute control over us is by denying food. And their is no doubt in my mind that this is the primary tactic of the fed's operational plan for confiscating American's guns. How many nights will Americans send their children to bed hungry before they trade their guns for food? We'll turn in our guns and federal agents will give us food vouchers. How long a food supply will last should be question that needs answering. But you get the idea.
The feds also have a plan of converting local cops in to agents of the federal government. Obama has already floated the idea of a national police force. But was it an idea or reality? I'm going with the latter. I'd go with the fed's plan consisting of federal agents attending every police agency briefing in the country where cops will be forced to swear allegiance to the federal government thus becoming federal agents or being fired. The federal government has to control us in order to retain control of what has become a de facto totalitarian government that oversees everything we do 24/7/365.
Most politicians, Republicans and Democrats, are neoconservatives. Neoconservatives are more harmful to Americans' lives than was Genrikh Yagoda and his Chekas who murdered at least 10 million Christians: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html Neoconservatives' plan is to use the democratic process to dupe Americans into voting to enslave themselves:
"So, what is to be done? How can America be saved from her dangerous fascination with liberty? Irving Kristol came up with the solution that has become the cornerstone of neoconservative policies: use democracy to defeat liberty. Turn the people against their own liberty. Convince them that liberty is licentiousness - that liberty undermines piety, leads to crime, drugs, rampant homosexuality, children out of wedlock, and family breakdown. And worse of all, liberalism is soft on communism or terrorism - whatever happens to be the enemy of the moment. [B]And if you can convince the people that liberty undermines their security, then, you will not have to take away their liberty; they will gladly renounce it."
Source: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6750.htm
The only authentic conservatives in the '16 Republican Primary were Paul, Carson, and Trump. Yes, Ted Cruz, by definition, is a neocon.
Our Founding Fathers were all noninterventionists. President Washington, in his Farewell Address, told us to say the hell outta other countries' internal affairs (mind our own damned business) and to avoid entangling alliances (treaties), for both will destroy the country they've created. When you hear a person call a noninterventionist the highly pejorative isolationist, the one using the noun isolationist is a neocon. A primary objective of neocons is the removal of Madison's Second Amendment from our constitution, which might be moot since neocons don't believe in or abide by our constitution.
The country that our Founding Fathers' created ceased to exist when the Federal Reserve Act was passed. We are far from a free people. We can do only that which our omnipotent federal government allows us to do. But we can take back our country. We must vote out every single neocon holding any political office. A great way to identify a neocon is whether they are interventionists. That's a dead giveaway. I've donated to Paul Nahlen's campaign to defeat the inveterate neocon, Paul Ryan. He's a sellout. He'll take our guns just as quickly as Chuck Schumer and Diane Feinstein.
There is a reason that neocons are scared sh@tless of Donald Trump. That reason alone is enough for him to have my support. In fact, I've donated directly to his campaign, and I've walked precincts for him. No neocon Republican would ever build a fence. That is antithetical to the New World Order, which is code for one-world-government. Trump knows that without secure borders, we have no country, which is the goal of neocons. I will never again donate a nickel to the Republican Party. I will donate only to candidates I want elected. Republican Party power brokers take our money and militate against us with it. In fact, I wouldn't care if the Republican Party were to wither away on an outbound zephyr. I'd love to see an authentic conservative party that is not a big tent. If Karl Rove, the Bush Cartel, Fox News, et al are part of a party, I'd want no part of it. None of them are conservatives. Fox News is the Neocon News Network. Bill O'Reilly supported Hurricane Katrina gun confiscation.
BTW, Trump is 100% right about getting us the heck outta NATO. We don't need NATO. NATO has the power to destroy our country. In fact, as we were admonished by President Washington, we need to extricate ourselves from every military treaty. We don't need other countries. They need us; more specifically, they need our soldiers dying for their benefit. Even better, I hope President Trump evicts the UN from Manhattan. Our Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew that we've allowed an American sovereignty compromising outfit within the country they've created.
This has become far more involved that I had intended. We have to become more politically astute. We have to know from whence we came to know where we are. We are not the country our Founding Fathers' created. We are a lot closer to a totalitarian regime where government controls us 24/7/365. Their primary method of control are laws that we must obey, but the ruling elite doesn't; hence, the Clintons escaping RICO for their criminal foundation that launders illegally obtained money.
State and local cops ought to know whether they might be forced to swear an oath to the feds thus becoming part of a federal police force, a concept our Founding Fathers feared.
We ought to engage in Socratic debate to determine indicators that gun confiscation in imminent and methods of confiscation. We must remain vigilant to attacks upon our Second Amendment. We must vote out every neocon, Republican and Democratic.
Keep a sharp eye on the NRA. While it claims to be a defender of the Second Amendment, it has supported gun control many times. I dropped out of the NRA when it supported Bush 41's gun control legislation. It might be a good idea to Google: "gun control laws NRA has supported." I've rejoined some 20 years later. But if it were to even remotely try to sell me on propriety of any gun control law again, I'll be gone for good.
Every single state and local law enforcement agency in our nation operates under the direct purview of our federal government. The fed's tactics of control are grant money that it will withhold if an agency deviates from federal rules and the ever-present latent threat of federal prosecution of the US Attorney's Office.
If the feds regulate the Internet, we ought to predict that bad acts will follow.
The players of the end game can't do it with one act of legislation; however, the supreme court can opine that the Second Amendment doesn't mean what Madison meant, which would be an injustice, an act that the court has perfected. Absent an anti-Second Amendment majority, congress proceeds incrementally: one little law at a time until de facto gun confiscation occurs. And this will happen. We saw it happen during Hurricane Katrina when citizens most needed their guns. The government practiced gun confiscation during an operation in Arcadia, IA. Officials running the plan to commit the unconstitutional act of confiscating our lawfully owned property that is protected by the Second Amendment tried to spin it. However, those in Arcadia knew exactly what was happening. Governmental agents were practicing confiscating Americans' lawfully owned guns: http://www.infowars.com/iowa-national-guard-to-train-for-gun-confiscation/ BTW, I first heard of this illegal operation from a friend who lives in Iowa who told me about it. He told me that it was a gun confiscation exercise, not anything other.
There is no doubt in my mind that our federal government has an operational plan to disarm Americans. Recently, Obama said as much under the auspices of martial law.
When I was a cop, other cops and I knew that we would not be exempt from gun confiscation. As far as I know, we're the only country that allows off-duty and honorably retired cops to carry handguns. Our brethren in Canada have to leave their guns in their lockers when 10-7. I wouldn't be surprised to see a law that prevents cops from carrying their guns while off-duty.
If we know the end game, we can predict anti-Second Amendment radicals' tactics. Like the unconstitutional Roe decision (Google Scholar: Bork Roe), which accorded congress ability to defer their constitutional mandate of legislation to the court thus according them ability to run from legislation legalizing the murder of the most innocent among us, congress would prefer the court to opine that the Second Amendment doesn't mean what Madison meant. That way it could escape accountability for destroying our Second Amendment, which would be a spurious argument.
Our Founding Fathers did not intend the Supreme Court to be equal to the two most important branches of government. The Supreme Court does not mete out justice. It metes out political agenda. If this were not true, if law and justice were controlling, political party affiliation would be immaterial. Another important consideration is the fallacy of Republicans are conservatives. Bush 41 & Bush 43 were Republicans. They were not conservatives. In fact, when liberals jam me about how badly Bush 43 screwed up our country, my reply is, "Why are you jamming me? Bush 43 was one of you guys, a liberal." We now know for certain that Romney is who we knew was in '12, which was why conservatives refused to support him.
Off of the top of my head, Samuel Chase was the last Supreme Court justice to have been impeached and removed. This is a very sad commentary of our legislative process. Does congress really want me to believe that since the late 18th or early 19th century, there has been only one justice impeached? Taney, after his Dred Scott decision, should've been impeached. Taney's objective, a Democrat, was to undermine Lincoln's presidential campaign platform. His decision had zero to do with justice. Warren Burger should have been impeached for his Roe. Earl Warren should have been impeached for routinely usurping congress's constitutional authority and blatant disregard for our constitution. Hugo Black should've been impeached for Everson. All seven justices in Plessy should have been impeached. So why did congress protect activist supreme court justices? Because they were patsies for congress. Congress needed them in order to insulate themselves from rebuke for unconstitutional decisions.
I do expect to see gun confiscation in my lifetime. Cops will not be exempt. They'll be issued guns upon going 10-8 and return them to agencies' armorers upon 10-7. However, America's ruling elite and those whom protect them will be exempt from gun confiscation. They will keep their guns. The rest of us will have our private property confiscated.
This is the absolute best treatise I've read that definitively explicates how America is ruled by a cartel of elites that feign affiliation with Democratic and Republican parties. They eat, drink, socialize, and sleep together: http://spectator.org/39326_americas-ruling-class-and-perils-revolution/ There is a reason why GOP elites, power brokers, and insiders are deathly afraid of a Trump presidency. Most frightened seem to be the Bush Cartel. What secrets are they afraid of being revealed to President Trump? I didn't know until recently that Nancy Reagan believed that Bush 41 was involved in President Reagan's assassination attempt. She was probably right. Bush 41 should have been done for murder during WWII: http://whowhatwhy.org/2014/09/02/an-enduring-mystery-about-bush-41s-wwii-escape-from-death/ Bush 41 has also been implicated in the murder of JFK. Family of Secrets exposed the Bush Cartel's crimes: http://www.amazon.com/Family-Secrets-Americas-Invisible-Government/dp/1608190064/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1465146710&sr=1-1&keywords=family+of+secrets
We, the People are no longer sovereign as our Founding Fathers intended:
"There is hardly a part of the United States where men are not aware that secret private purposes and interests have been running the government."
---US President Woodrow Wilson---
We are ruled. We haven't been governed since the Federal Reserve Act. The Federal Reserve Act has stripped Americans of individual liberties that are deemed dangerous to America's ruling elite. We, the People must regain control of our government. We can't blame politicians for confiscating our Guns. We have to blame ourselves for voting for traitors. Bush 43 said that he'd of signed Brady Bill renewing legislation if congress had presented it to him. His daddy did sign gun control legislation. We must not be duped by the false assumption that Republicans will protect our Second Amendment, for they are within America's ruling elite.
If you know what's likely to occur, you can prepare. Look for an excuse for a declaration of martial law. The excuse could be real or phony. The intent is to create an excuse to confiscate our guns. Then think about how federal agents could accomplish their plan. Going door-to-door is probably their last tactic. Rather, the feds would prefer that we voluntarily turn in our guns. So how could it convince us to turn in our guns? If anyone has studied Stalin's forced famine that killed tens of millions or the Iranian Holocaust that exterminated up to half of its population, we can make valid predictions. The most practical method of absolute control over us is by denying food. And their is no doubt in my mind that this is the primary tactic of the fed's operational plan for confiscating American's guns. How many nights will Americans send their children to bed hungry before they trade their guns for food? We'll turn in our guns and federal agents will give us food vouchers. How long a food supply will last should be question that needs answering. But you get the idea.
The feds also have a plan of converting local cops in to agents of the federal government. Obama has already floated the idea of a national police force. But was it an idea or reality? I'm going with the latter. I'd go with the fed's plan consisting of federal agents attending every police agency briefing in the country where cops will be forced to swear allegiance to the federal government thus becoming federal agents or being fired. The federal government has to control us in order to retain control of what has become a de facto totalitarian government that oversees everything we do 24/7/365.
Most politicians, Republicans and Democrats, are neoconservatives. Neoconservatives are more harmful to Americans' lives than was Genrikh Yagoda and his Chekas who murdered at least 10 million Christians: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html Neoconservatives' plan is to use the democratic process to dupe Americans into voting to enslave themselves:
"So, what is to be done? How can America be saved from her dangerous fascination with liberty? Irving Kristol came up with the solution that has become the cornerstone of neoconservative policies: use democracy to defeat liberty. Turn the people against their own liberty. Convince them that liberty is licentiousness - that liberty undermines piety, leads to crime, drugs, rampant homosexuality, children out of wedlock, and family breakdown. And worse of all, liberalism is soft on communism or terrorism - whatever happens to be the enemy of the moment. [B]And if you can convince the people that liberty undermines their security, then, you will not have to take away their liberty; they will gladly renounce it."
Source: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6750.htm
The only authentic conservatives in the '16 Republican Primary were Paul, Carson, and Trump. Yes, Ted Cruz, by definition, is a neocon.
Our Founding Fathers were all noninterventionists. President Washington, in his Farewell Address, told us to say the hell outta other countries' internal affairs (mind our own damned business) and to avoid entangling alliances (treaties), for both will destroy the country they've created. When you hear a person call a noninterventionist the highly pejorative isolationist, the one using the noun isolationist is a neocon. A primary objective of neocons is the removal of Madison's Second Amendment from our constitution, which might be moot since neocons don't believe in or abide by our constitution.
The country that our Founding Fathers' created ceased to exist when the Federal Reserve Act was passed. We are far from a free people. We can do only that which our omnipotent federal government allows us to do. But we can take back our country. We must vote out every single neocon holding any political office. A great way to identify a neocon is whether they are interventionists. That's a dead giveaway. I've donated to Paul Nahlen's campaign to defeat the inveterate neocon, Paul Ryan. He's a sellout. He'll take our guns just as quickly as Chuck Schumer and Diane Feinstein.
There is a reason that neocons are scared sh@tless of Donald Trump. That reason alone is enough for him to have my support. In fact, I've donated directly to his campaign, and I've walked precincts for him. No neocon Republican would ever build a fence. That is antithetical to the New World Order, which is code for one-world-government. Trump knows that without secure borders, we have no country, which is the goal of neocons. I will never again donate a nickel to the Republican Party. I will donate only to candidates I want elected. Republican Party power brokers take our money and militate against us with it. In fact, I wouldn't care if the Republican Party were to wither away on an outbound zephyr. I'd love to see an authentic conservative party that is not a big tent. If Karl Rove, the Bush Cartel, Fox News, et al are part of a party, I'd want no part of it. None of them are conservatives. Fox News is the Neocon News Network. Bill O'Reilly supported Hurricane Katrina gun confiscation.
BTW, Trump is 100% right about getting us the heck outta NATO. We don't need NATO. NATO has the power to destroy our country. In fact, as we were admonished by President Washington, we need to extricate ourselves from every military treaty. We don't need other countries. They need us; more specifically, they need our soldiers dying for their benefit. Even better, I hope President Trump evicts the UN from Manhattan. Our Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew that we've allowed an American sovereignty compromising outfit within the country they've created.
This has become far more involved that I had intended. We have to become more politically astute. We have to know from whence we came to know where we are. We are not the country our Founding Fathers' created. We are a lot closer to a totalitarian regime where government controls us 24/7/365. Their primary method of control are laws that we must obey, but the ruling elite doesn't; hence, the Clintons escaping RICO for their criminal foundation that launders illegally obtained money.
State and local cops ought to know whether they might be forced to swear an oath to the feds thus becoming part of a federal police force, a concept our Founding Fathers feared.
We ought to engage in Socratic debate to determine indicators that gun confiscation in imminent and methods of confiscation. We must remain vigilant to attacks upon our Second Amendment. We must vote out every neocon, Republican and Democratic.
Keep a sharp eye on the NRA. While it claims to be a defender of the Second Amendment, it has supported gun control many times. I dropped out of the NRA when it supported Bush 41's gun control legislation. It might be a good idea to Google: "gun control laws NRA has supported." I've rejoined some 20 years later. But if it were to even remotely try to sell me on propriety of any gun control law again, I'll be gone for good.
Every single state and local law enforcement agency in our nation operates under the direct purview of our federal government. The fed's tactics of control are grant money that it will withhold if an agency deviates from federal rules and the ever-present latent threat of federal prosecution of the US Attorney's Office.
If the feds regulate the Internet, we ought to predict that bad acts will follow.