RJ
01-15-2016, 03:52 PM
Can someone explain the Trump/Cruz Birther Thing?
Cruz says he is "natural born" due to his being born of American Parents (Mother, at least) in Canada. Trump says he needs a 'declaratory judgement', whatever that is.
Section 1 Article Two of the Constitution sez:
"...No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause
Now, here is where I have a question, from personal experience, that I am confused about.
Like probably some of you Service Brats, I was born in the 50s in West Germany of American Parents. I hold a citizenship because I was naturalized in 1967 on arrival in the US when my dad moved back to the states to work in Washington DC. I have a German Birth Certificate, Naturalization Certificate and a US Passport.
My son was born in Portsmouth England in the 90s, to my ex and I, i.e. American parents, while I was on a multi-year assignment in the UK. We took him to the American Embassy in Grosvenor Square in London when he was about 6 months, and swore in front of the United States Marine, that he was our son. He received a US Passport on the spot. He has an English Birth Certificate.
So, I am a bit confused. Is my son natural born? I assume so?
What happened between the 50s and the 90s that (apparently) affected the "natural born citizen" status of those born overseas (like me vs. Ted Cruz).
Any Constitutional Scholars here (I am not one) able to explain all this?
Does Trump have a point, and will Cruz have to get one of these Declaratory Judgements?
I just thought it was topical, and kind of interesting since both my son and I were born overseas...I have resigned myself to the fact I will never be President...:cool:
Cruz says he is "natural born" due to his being born of American Parents (Mother, at least) in Canada. Trump says he needs a 'declaratory judgement', whatever that is.
Section 1 Article Two of the Constitution sez:
"...No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause
Now, here is where I have a question, from personal experience, that I am confused about.
Like probably some of you Service Brats, I was born in the 50s in West Germany of American Parents. I hold a citizenship because I was naturalized in 1967 on arrival in the US when my dad moved back to the states to work in Washington DC. I have a German Birth Certificate, Naturalization Certificate and a US Passport.
My son was born in Portsmouth England in the 90s, to my ex and I, i.e. American parents, while I was on a multi-year assignment in the UK. We took him to the American Embassy in Grosvenor Square in London when he was about 6 months, and swore in front of the United States Marine, that he was our son. He received a US Passport on the spot. He has an English Birth Certificate.
So, I am a bit confused. Is my son natural born? I assume so?
What happened between the 50s and the 90s that (apparently) affected the "natural born citizen" status of those born overseas (like me vs. Ted Cruz).
Any Constitutional Scholars here (I am not one) able to explain all this?
Does Trump have a point, and will Cruz have to get one of these Declaratory Judgements?
I just thought it was topical, and kind of interesting since both my son and I were born overseas...I have resigned myself to the fact I will never be President...:cool: