PDA

View Full Version : AAR: Vickers Tactical 3 day Advanced Handgun & Carbine class 06/17-06/19/11



LittleLebowski
07-11-2011, 04:51 PM
This review is written concerning the Vickers Tactical three day Advanced Carbine and Handgun class conducted at Myock, North Carolina June 17-19th, 2011 conducted by Larry Vickers (http://vickerstactical.com/), a retired Delta Force operator.

My background:


I am a civilian with eight years of experience as an infantry Marine. I have attended handgun and carbine courses from Larry Vickers, Todd Green, and Kyle Defoor. I have additional long range rifle training from my brother (http://www.firearmstrainingandtactics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=901) who is an combat veteran 8541 and 8542 (Marine Scout Sniper).


Equipment used:

Pistol (http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h251/baxshep/Fingergrooves2.jpg): Gen4 Glock 19 with "04" marked recoil spring assembly, White Sound Defense H.R.E.D upgraded spressor spring assembly (http://www.whitesounddefense.com/products/H.R.E.D.-9mm.html), Gen3 smooth face trigger, Vickers Tactical slide release, and Warren Tactical 2 dot tritium night sights. Pistol ammo used was 115 grain ball WWB (Winchester White Box). This pistol had about 4200 rds through it at the time of this class. At about 3500 rds, it started stovepiping regularly. A call to Glock was made and they sent the 04 marked recoil spring assembly. An additional stovepipe made me decide to try out the H.R.E.D depressor spring upgrade. I have had no malfunctions since installing the H.R.E.D. and recommend it to owners of problematic Gen4 9mm Glock owners. That being said, I will note that it is sad that I have to work on a 9mm Glock to make it run as my other Gen3 Glock 19 does. Weapon was not cleaned for the duration of the class and was lubed with Triflo bicycle chain lubricant (http://www.triflowlubricants.com/Tri-Flow_Superior_Drip_Lubricant.html). Weapon was carried concealed AIWB (Appendix Inside Waist Band) in a Custom Carry Concepts Shaggy (http://shop.customcarryconcepts.com/Shaggy-AIWB-SHG.htm?productId=12) for the entire class. Unless safety concerns present themselves, I will always train carrying my pistol concealed in the same manner I do day to day.

This Glock was equipped with Todd Green's "Gadget" (http://pistol-forum.com/showthread.php?712-The-Gadget-REVEALED) for the last two days of the class. The "gadget" did not effect operation of the Glock one whit and it took no time at all to learn to keep my strong side thumb on the "gadget" as I reholstered, thereby ensuring complete safety as I reholstered. Larry weighed in on the "gadget" and said that he thinks it is good for those that carry appendix but he reserves full judgement until he's seen more long term data on it. Myself, now I've taken it to an Vickers advanced class and carried concealed with it installed a month, I find it absolutely indispensable. It does not effect operation of the pistol whatsoever and provides a seemingly foolproof way to counteract unwelcome happenings while reholstering such as clothing getting caught in the trigger guard. Any movement of the trigger is instantly detected and readily counteracted by your thumb on the "gadget." This is the first time this device has been used in a Vickers Tactical class. Over 400 trouble free rds were put through my Glock 19 while equipped with the "gadget."

I do not recommend Gen4 9mm Glocks for purchase because of my experiences with my Gen4 G19 and my Gen4 G17. Larry Vickers does not either after observing them in classes.


Rifle (http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h251/baxshep/IMAG0125.jpg): S&W M&P15R in 5.45x39mm. This rifle is on its second barrel and is absolutely a high performing, relaible and capable weapon, even at 14k+ rds (barrel was replaced at about 11k rds after being shot out). It is a 16" barreled M4 pattern carbine with Magpul MOE stock and handgrip. Magpul XTM panels allow me to use my weak hand to grasp the nice, cheap YHM lightweight rail without gloves. A Surefire G2 incan (need an LED upgrade, I know!) is attached at about 10 o'clock using a VTAC polymer mount. A Blue Force Gear Vickers padded sling is my slign choice and it performed perfectly with me giving thanks for having the forethought to opt for the padded model. My trusty Aimpoint Micro H1 on a LaRue QD mount is my optic with the standard front sight tower and a YHM rear sight for the iron sights. The entire package performed perfectly; both in reliability and accuracy, and never once let me down, even using the much maligned C Products 5.45x39mm magazines. This was my first time training with a carbine equipped with the LaRue Handstop (http://stores.homestead.com/Laruetactical/Detail.bok?no=465) and the piece worked as advertised, giving me a firm index point that worked perfectly. Ammo used was 80's era Soviet surplus 53 grain 5.45x39mm. Triflo lube was also used on this rifle. The rifle was not cleaned for the duration of the class. I used Kytex mag carriers (http://www.kytexgear.com/AR15.html) and was very favorably impressed with them. Positive retention and easy to slip on and off your belt when say, going to lunch.



TD1:

In order to lay the foundation for the rest of the class, Larry devoted TD1 to pistol shooting. Following a tried and true Vickers theme, no matter if the class is Basic or Advanced, you started off with the basics of marksmanship focusing on trigger control. With a pistol, trigger control is paramount with sight picture a close second. We paired up and worked on smooth trigger presses on an empty pistol while making sure not to knock the empty casing balanced on the front sight. After that, we moved onto command ball and dummy. Your partner hands you a pistol that may or may not be loaded. You apply the fundamentals and fire at the target. If you snatch the trigger and/or flinch, you dry fire properly five times.

After the rehashing of the fundamentals, we were off and running in a very advanced day of pistol shooting. We started working on speed and accuracy drills with emphasis of course being given to the latter as per Larry's philosophy developed after years of experience as a trigger puller and trainer for Delta. The class was formed into teams for competitive drills. Individual and team drills rounded out every lesson with "sleeper" competitors in every team. In other words, it was a hihgly competitive environment with highly skilled fellow students sprinkled throughout the entire class.

One drill that was 10 shots at 10 yards 5 seconds (I think that was the distance, maybe a fellow student could help?) I was certain I had won it and then a mysterious quiet fella beat me by a few fractions of a second which illustrates the caliber of the students at this class. As TD1 progressed, a familiar feeling made itself known. That feeling being "Holy hell, every drill we just ran today was at a longer distance than I normally shoot and I'm doing fine". That being said, we didn't notice we were being pushed by our instructor. Everyone continued to perform well. We ran a modified version of the "Humbler" with ShawnL winning the event and the Rudy Project glasses offered as a prize. Shawn was way ahead of the rest of the class and used a nicely setup Glock 17 set up with an RTF2 frame and an older slide with straight cocking grooves and an X300 (I think) attached.

Another Vickers constant was the targets and scoring. To put it simply, accuracy is the final determination. Hits on target count. In this class, hits in the black count with scoring preference being given in some drills to the hits in the 10 ring. Don't show up to a Vickers class not ready to push yourself to keep all of the rounds in the black. Larry teaches that under stress, your group size will double hence the need to hold yourself to high standards when training.

One of my "aha!" moments of training from my Vickers Advanced Handgun three day class was taught again; this being Larry's explanation of the "wobble zone." Basically, shooters whether moving or not but especially while shooting on the move get wrapped up in and discombobulated by watching the sight wobble over the target and spend too long trying to and never achieving the "perfect" sight picture instead of taking the shot as the sight picture momentarily appears. Learning at what distances you can shoot at what speed is important. Obviously you can shoot faster at 10 yards than 25 yards if you know your zero and how you and your weapon perform at varying speed and distances. There's no better way to learn this than from the instructor who will teach the concept and push you.

Shooting on the move helped reinforce the "wobble" lesson. A walkback drill drove home the lesson that at Vickers advanced classes, you never know who is going to outshoot you. It also helped me see that my rear sights needed to be adjusted right. Luckily Stoney/Paragon6 had a Glock sight pusher on hand.

Shooting steel both static and moving gave instant and authoritative feedback to the students.


TD2:

Today was the start of the carbine training. We zeroed at 100 yards from the prone. Larry pointed out that he does not see the need for magnified optics on a carbine 100 yards and in. Aimpoints on ARs were the rule with two Eotechs malfunctioning throughout the class as Larry predicted they would. After doing a qualifier that consisted of prone at 100, sitting at 75, kneeling at 50, and standing at 25 yard, we spent the rest of the class shooting from 50 yards and in. Individual drills were conducted that coalesced into team drills. One lesson learned is that a 100 yard zero quickly becomes very low at 25 yards. Bracketing the bullseye by a good 6" or half again of the black portion of the target got hits in the center for my team (Team Short Bus!).

Weak handed shooting and transtioning from strong hand to weak hand was taught and with the help of Larry and Stoney (fellow student and VSM instructor), I fixed my technique that needed work on. Switching forward hands, exaggerating the downward orientation of the muzzle got the sling out of my way and made switching shoulders second nature to me. Of course having a red dot sight made weak handed shooting far easier. Larry firmly drove home the fact that backup iron sights should be already deployed in case of optic failure. He advocates a 1/3 cowitness.

This was a grueling day becuase of the heat and humidity. I switched to some cargo shorts and running shoes from my cargo pants and hiking boots and immediately felt better. After lunch, we got a treat in that the class got to watch the upcoming Tactical TV episode (https://danieldefense.com/TortureTest) on Larry's torture test of a Daniel Defense M4. I won't ruin it for those who haven't seen it but let's just say it was impressive to say the least. As always, Larry was absolutely honest about the techniques and methodology used. If you don't want to know the answer, don't ask Larry because no matter what the question is (even about the products he endorses), he will tell you the honest truth as he sees it. Thew new Glock commercial with Gunny Ermey had us laughing out loud and applauding. Folks were pushing themselves hard on this day due to the aforementioned heat. Gatorade and salting your food is strongly recommended.

Transition to secondary weapon (pistol) was taught today. This was covered in a safe yet speedy method, helped immensely by a proper sling. If at 50 yards and in or directly engaging with a carbine and you experiences a malfunction or run out of ammo, immediate transition to secondary is the fastest and best way to stay in the fight.

Reloads were covered along with Larry's excellent techniques concerning malfunction clearing. I can only hope that the US military is using a variant of this after comparing it to the SPORTS technique I was taught in Marine Corps Boot Camp circa 1995.

An unexpected surprise was Larry showing us his full auto dealer sample HK MP7. The entire class shot it. About halfway through, the weapon was getting too hot to hold on the handguards. As a testament to HK engineering and QC, Larry cooled the weapon with a bottle of water that literally boiled out of the weapon's various openings. No lube was added and the weapon was back in students' hands, firing full auto with nary a malfunction.

As on TD1, we shot on paper and moving and static steel.


TD3

Today was the logical extension of everything we had learned in the past two days. A great deal of shooting the move with a carbine and shooting a carbine from behind barricades was taught. As always thoughout this class, the instructor showed us all how it was done and his groups were indeed humbling. Unfortunately, I missed out on the latter half of this training day as I had to drive home and see my brother off to overseas. The last part of this day was spent doing shooting from a moving vehicle.


Lessons learned

- I need to work on bending my knees while shooting on the move. I diagnosed this from seeing pictures of myself during the class.

- as mentioned earlier, swinging the carbine's muzzle down when transitioning shoulders clears the
sling very effectively.

- drive the dot (front sight of the pistol) when shooting at speed! I found out that I need to worry a
little less about the rear sight and concentrate on this. Larry's lecture on the "wobble zone"
helped immensely.

- know your carbine and pistol's zero at both standard and close distances. Pick one distance for each
and at least know the zero for both.

- Aimpoints rule the day. You are far, far less likely to have problems with an Aimpoint than an
Eotech.

- padded slings are a must for your neck.

- one doesn't need load carrying gear, multicam, and drop holsters to be competitive. I made a point
of using a minimal amount of gear and shooting from concealment and my times and accuracy
never suffered. That being said, if you are LEO or military, classes like these are an excellent
opportunity to push yourself in the gear your rely upon every day. As always, safety overrrides
gear everytime.

- using the "gadget" (http://pistol-forum.com/showthread.php?712-The-Gadget-REVEALED) makes AIWB reholstering less of a "going to take this extra slow to avoid losing my wedding tackle or shooting my femoral atery
" exercise. I'm sold.

- there really is nothing comparable to learning from combat vets like Vickers. The class is
deceivingly simple in how he lays the foundations and before you know it, you hammering out
groups at distances you never have shot so well at before.

- searching and assessing with the weapon and having your eyes behind the sights works better for me than simply doing a visual scan. When doing an search and assess in a training or crowded environment, Larry recommends
going into a SUL position to avoid flagging innocents with muzzle.

- you are an absolute fool if you consider yourself a shooter and do not seek out training from people like this.

fuse
07-11-2011, 06:58 PM
I reckon a student shooting the secondary from concealment does not happen much in a carbine course. Good on ya.

Were there others doing as you were?

sent via Android 3.1

LittleLebowski
07-11-2011, 08:31 PM
I reckon a student shooting the secondary from concealment does not happen much in a carbine course. Good on ya.

Were there others doing as you were?

sent via Android 3.1

Nope. I got a few looks but my times on drills and my accuracy did not suffer. Larry warned me to be extra careful during transitions to secondary and of course, I heeded his advice.

LittleLebowski
07-12-2011, 08:35 AM
http://i846.photobucket.com/albums/ab25/greygroupcommunity/Vickers%203%20Day%20Advanced%20Pistol-Carbine%20June%202011/IMG_0850.jpg

http://i846.photobucket.com/albums/ab25/greygroupcommunity/Vickers%203%20Day%20Advanced%20Pistol-Carbine%20June%202011/IMG_0822.jpg

http://i846.photobucket.com/albums/ab25/greygroupcommunity/Vickers%203%20Day%20Advanced%20Pistol-Carbine%20June%202011/IMG_0827.jpg

LittleLebowski
07-12-2011, 08:36 AM
Firing Larry's dealer sample full auto HK MP7 4.6mm. Tactical TV was there filming us.

http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h251/baxshep/MP7.jpg

http://i846.photobucket.com/albums/ab25/greygroupcommunity/Vickers%203%20Day%20Advanced%20Pistol-Carbine%20June%202011/IMG_0719.jpg

http://i846.photobucket.com/albums/ab25/greygroupcommunity/IMG_1398.jpg

F-Trooper05
10-05-2011, 12:54 AM
What are Larry's thought on the MP7?

LittleLebowski
10-05-2011, 11:10 AM
What are Larry's thought on the MP7?

That was the first day he'd shot it but he seemed to like it quite a bit and said it definitely has a role in CQB.

theblacknight
10-08-2011, 08:03 AM
Thats rad. Ive been on TV a couple times, but not for anything this cool.

DocGKR
10-14-2011, 01:07 AM
Small caliber PDW's like the MP7 and P90 are niche weapons that have very narrow and specific roles to play.

Below are comments specifically on the MP7 by a combat experienced senior SOF NCO currently serving in the U.S. military:


”When employing the MP7 up close, you literally use it like a fire hose and sprinkle 4.6 all over the torso of the guy you want to reduce (usually on Auto, which is a CQB no-go anyway), and you have to keep hosing him down with bullets until his brain figures out that you are filling him in. Usually this takes longer than shooting a NSR with a rifle, so by the time that your brain figures out that the guy has quit and is crumpling, you are almost out of bullets and any other threats in the room have most likely started to engage you. IF your team is on their **** and everyone grasps the true importance of primary/secondary sectors of fire, then perhaps you can get in there and all of your guys can sprinkle 4.6 liberally on all of the bad guys in an efficient manner, but if you fail to do that, then bad things will happen quickly.”

Pat Rogers, a former NYPD officer and combat veteran Marine, is a highly respected firearms trainer who has also commented on the use of small caliber PDW’s like 4.6 and 5.7 mm:


”Multiple rounds are required to incapacitate. This means significantly more training, which translates into significantly more ammunition expended, at a higher cost per round and with limited sources available. To ensure immediate incapacitation, brain shots will need to be emphasized. Which requires more training, and also more insertion of luck into the equation- especially dealing with multiple opponents. Limited capability within the system means engagement at anything outside of CQB distances may be problematic. This means movement to objective, egress etc will present a whole new range of difficulties. The gun is easy to shoot and fun as well. This does not always translate well to real world applications. If there is a single reason why these platforms are in any way superior to the M4 FOW, it is not apparent to me.””

A decorated, experienced SWAT officer at a U.S. LE agency that has had multiple OIS incidents with 5.7 mm FN P90's has written the following--note that his comments equally apply to the 4.6 mm MP7:


”The 5.7 pistol as a carry gun is a mistake. There are far more effective weapons and ammunition combinations out there. The only factor that comes close to equalizing the P90 (not the 5.7 pistol) is it's full auto capability: 900 rpm of very controllable fire. Even this advantage is limited to close-in, CQB type engagements. I can put more rounds on target faster with the P90 than with my M4 in close contact engagements. Unfortunately you may HAVE to put more rounds in the threat due to the lack of damage the projectile causes. The 5.56 is far more effective at getting the attention of men than 5.7 mm. This is not speculation. We have been using 30 P90's for five years now. There have been multiple BG's shot with them. We will not be buying more 5.7 mm or other small caliber PDW systems””

As a result of poor terminal performance, a large Federal agency is also no longer running P90’s like they used to. Likewise, some military units that tried small caliber PDW's in combat are procuring other options, like 9" .300 Blackout uppers to run on M4 lowers.

When a civilian LE agency chooses a full-auto system, significantly more time is needed for training. This increases costs, both in the amount of ammunition necessary to purchase, as well as the need to pay officers for increased time in training, rather than being in the field. Instead of a 1-5 shot NSR with an AR15 based system, with an MP7 each officer is now going to be routinely shooting 15-20+ rounds into each target both in training and in actual OIS incidents, thus the amount of ammo expended is going to be 4 times what would be used with an AR15 based system shooting any common CQB caliber like 5.56 mm, .300 Blackout, 6.8mm, or even 7.62x51mm. How is an LE agency going to afford four times more training ammo for a weapon system like the MP7 that needs to be always shot full auto and whose ammo is more expensive than other common calibers?

In the civilian realm, how is an LE agency going to explain to their Admin and media why they are now needing to shoot every suspect 15-20+ times? In addition, when you are having to shoot 15-20 rounds full-auto at every target, there is a higher likelihood that some of those rounds may miss the target; how is an LE agency going to handle the liability from the potential increased number of missed shots that can occur with a system that needs to be used full-auto like a "fire hose" in order to offer adequate incapacitation of threats?

With the data now available, a U.S. LE agency would have to be woefully ignorant or colossally stupid to purchase the MP7 (or P90) for SWAT use given the numerous weapon systems available for LE SWAT/CQB use that are both better and more cost effective than small caliber PDW's. If SBR's are desired, consider a 10-12" 5.56 mm using properly selected good quality barrier blind ammunition (see: http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=19881), 8-12" .300 Blackout uppers when appropriate LE ammo is finally released (6-12 months away); even better get 8-12" 6.8 mm's uppers, or if you want to have the best terminal performance go with the new group of 16" .308 rifles like the KAC SR25 EMC, LaRue Predatar (or OBR for precision use), or the FN Mk17/SCAR-H using appropriate ammunition (see: http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=19878).