Glad to hear you are liking her. Mine has yet to auto forward. I even tried to whack the mag a few times after loading it. Had to send a vid to my buddy because his does it with the slightest insert. I hope mine will not do under my normal reloads. I am not a huge fan of the auto forward. Definitely a personal thing thoughOriginally Posted by md8232
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mine requires a decent shove to auto-forward. Generally speaking, I don't ram mags in when the action is open since there is no real resistance to overcome.
For any interested parties, MAC just did their gauntlet test and the pistol did pretty damn well. Tim claims it to be in the top three although I think the G17 did a little better. The Glock stopped sooner (sand) but didn't reach a point where it was inoperable like the P10C did once the mud was caked all up in the trigger group. I think it bested the PPQ and definitely did better than the M&P.
Glad to hear you are liking her. Mine has yet to auto forward. I even tried to whack the mag a few times after loading it. Had to send a vid to my buddy because his does it with the slightest insert. I hope mine will not do under my normal reloads. I am not a huge fan of the auto forward. Definitely a personal thing though
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actually, it was the P07, Rex 01 and now the P10-C that did well in his tests. P10-C first striker to do this well.
Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.
Back from a range outing today and had some interesting outcomes. First up I did the Dot torture for the first time with the P10C at 3 yards and cleaned it reasonably comfortably. Had one round hit the top edge of the circle on the first round strong hand only but cut it in half so I lowered the aiming point a fraction. This was with the new(to me but used) P10C I recently traded for. I did some Bill drills at 3 and 5 yards. Then I tried the 10-8 extractor test or a version of it. I shot 20 rounds total, (10 2 handed and 10 strong hand only) I guess I don't read well as I thought it was 10 each. I used a magazine to load the rounds and removed it before firing as I don't care to have the extractor slam over the case rim just for testing. Out of the 20 rounds I had 4 cases stay in the gun(catch on feedramp or in ejection port) and 1 round fall out of magazine well. The rest ejected fine and none came back at me.
I finished up shooting 10 rounds one handed SHO and WHO in each position straight up, sights at 3 o clock,sights at 6 o clock and sights at 9 o clock with a weapon mounted light on the gun. No issues using Sellier and Bellot 115gr.
Lastly I did the same 10-8 extrastor test with my Glock 23 with 9mm conv barrel and the Beretta APX. The Glock hit me with brass 3 times in the head on right side(hit bar of hearing muffs) caught 3 rounds in the slide/feedramp area and had 2 rounds drop out the magwell. The funny thing is that this gun (Gen 2 probably 30k rounds through it) has never had any ejection issues with any ammo in 40 cal or 9mm. The APX ran perfectly except 1 round came out mag well.
The new to me P10C is running great and has a better trigger than my other P10C.
Sorry if this was posted already I didn't recall seeing it. This guy compared spring rates and other factors as they relate to trigger weight and pull characteristics and aftermarket trigger and other P10C info.
http://minivandoorgunner.blogspot.co...heta-flat.html
The most impressive aspect to me is the reduction in take up, I didn't see it mentioned in the article but was the trigger reset affected at all with the hbi trigger?
Wholeheartedly concur. If you want a 1911 trigger, get a 1911 and learn how to safely operate a single action only pistol with multiple redundant safeties. But, that's just my opinion...I still think pre-travel reduction in the P-10C is ill-advised -- but I also feel the same way about it in the Glock.
Interesting video from Omaha Outdoors on the P10C. Anyone else having issues with their striker rotating in the channel? First I've heard of this issue.
Shoot more, post less...
Just saw the video a few minutes ago. The movement in the striker looks like a very peculiar design flaw; why is it not completely constrained to the striker channel?
Reply With Quote
