Is there any recoil difference between the 4” and 2.75”?
The short barrel 69 looks like it would make a great fanny pack revolver. Here is mine -- I managed to fit L frame grips on it.
Last edited by GJM; 01-14-2022 at 07:58 PM.
Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.
Here are two more
2.5" S&W M329
and a 2.5" Taurus Titanium Tracker in .41 mag (Grizly 250gr WFN go 1,150 fps from this little fire breather).
Necrobump because I find myself desiring a .44 Special launcher and I've driven myself to analysis paralysis. I'm generally drawn to 4" revolvers but I am finding my 3" 686+ to be pleasant as well. How differently do the 4.25" and 2.75" M69s handle? Or is there really not enough difference to notice?
If I'm just shooting poofter loads (think Russian in a .44 Special case) for plinking fun and the Skeeter load as my top end, am I really giving up any significant performance with the shorter barrel?
Nothing so needs reforming as other people's habits - Mark Twain
Tact is the knack of making a point without making an enemy / Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
I, too, have a 5" 629 Classic (full lug) that is surprisingly accurate. When used to hunt boar(s) I'd carry it in a Bruce Nelson chest rig. Craig Spegel made a set of boot grips for the gun. It was one of those times when everything simply came together in a deeply satisfying way. Don't shoot it much anymore, but sometimes I sit and caress it and just remember.
Duces
A peaceful man is capable of great violence, but he keeps it under control. If a man is not capable of violence, he is not peaceful. He is just harmless. (Jordan Peterson)