I believe his term ends December this year, with the election slated for July, according to the USPSA contact directory:Originally Posted by DMF13
https://uspsa.org/contact
I believe his term ends December this year, with the election slated for July, according to the USPSA contact directory:
https://uspsa.org/contact
...and logging in the latest on the Rutkowski lawsuit, I have not refreshed this in a while.
I guess I will complete the updates by posting the remaining part of the name index, these are other people or personalities one sees involved in the discussions.
Stanton was the A4D, and I believe Cabana was A7D....and logging in the latest on the Rutkowski lawsuit, I have not refreshed this in a while.
Anyone know what was said about Scott Arnburg, at the second half of the meeting, tonight?
_______________
"Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?" Then I said, "Here I am. Send me." - Isaiah 6:8
I finally watched the 2/28/24 meeting, which is available here:
https://youtu.be/1U_E8hdogDM?si=0-fujLx--SIIVDFg
They are awaiting a "memorandum of law," which may, or may not, be followed by a "legal opinion."
"Attorney Jim" explained that the "memorandum" could be based on firm policy, and/or the lack of a definitive answer. According to him, an "opinion," would be the result of a definitive answer, if firm policy allows for that.
IMO, if there is no definitive answer, the board should bring Arnburg back, saying that due to a lack of a definitive "legal opinion," they are bringing Arnburg back to avoid potential costly litigation. That way they actually avoid the cost of any litigation, and get to "save face," by painting the move as the fiscally responsible decision, rather than what it really is, which is reversing their ham fisted attempt at removing someone who was serious about reform, which resulted in open revolt by the members.
They really should have done that long before spending money on lawyers, to get a "memorandum of law," and/or "legal opinion.". They could have simply n said that due to the questions about the legality of the move they were nullifying the removal of Arnburg, and brought him back. They would have saved thousands of dollars in legal fees, and slowed, if not completely stopped, the revolution.
Last edited by DMF13; 03-02-2024 at 01:21 AM.
_______________
"Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?" Then I said, "Here I am. Send me." - Isaiah 6:8
The court docket posted this on 8 July:
I assume this means the lawsuit was dismissed?
ETA: The Case status is showing "Closed" on the web site, so I assume so.
Last edited by RJ; 07-09-2024 at 06:12 AM.
Reply With Quote