Saw this on another site. Looks tasty.
Looks like it's legit: Shooting Illustrated
Original Post Source
Saw this on another site. Looks tasty.
Looks like it's legit: Shooting Illustrated
Original Post Source
I do too, although I have no pragmatic use for one.
The most powerful and harmful influence Trump has had on our politics…has been the effect on his opponents. They have been triggered into an orgy of self-mutilation—eager to amputate their own history and disfigure their own political traditions.
Can I get a non-take down with iron sights? Or at least a continuous rail across the top to add sights to?
Originally Posted by MattyD380
Don’t need, but kind of want. With a side folder brace (a flat one like the Sig MPX)...
That would be Sexy.
“A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.” - Shane
Why do we need a take down barrel on a pistol?
Why is there no way to add front BUIS?
Other than that, I'd be interested in taking a look if it's reliable and accurate. Mated to an SBA4, could be a cool PCC alternative.
Another vote for a non takedown version (of both the carbine and the charger). A continuous rail would be nice as well for irons.
Instagram: sometimesishootCs
Give it time a company like Midwest industries might come out with one in a few months
I don’t think I’ve seen him go all giggly and drop an “eF! It!” during a review. I just wish he didn’t keep calling it a “carbine”.
The only way the takedown feature makes sense is to leave a suppressor attached and in a discreet bag. But the only way Ruger makes that whole series of guns is with the takedown feature. They’d need to re-engineer a non-takedown version.
I can see me getting one.
These are giving me the wantsies.
--Josh
“Formerly we suffered from crimes; now we suffer from laws.” - Tacitus.
Reply With Quote