Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2101112
Results 111 to 117 of 117

Thread: Vetting Ruger GP100s for Carry/Defense Use

  1. #111
    Member JonInWA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Auburn, WA
    Quote Originally Posted by SwampDweller View Post
    Went through my notes again. Yes, you have that straight. Although I think there was a brief moment where the action was stiffer but a quick scrub/wipe in the relevant areas quickly remedied that.

    So maybe I'm just reading too much into this and it's fine?
    Here's a potential perspective:

    How do you envision your use/use venues of the GP100? Carry? Defensive? Duty? IDPA/ASI? USPSA? Area 1?

    For most of these venues, as long as the sucker works well (and without binding) for 200 rounds, I think you're fine. That assumes, of course, that you'll properly clean and lightly lube between uses, and that you're using quality ammunition.

    For total anti-zombie piece of mind, I think the best test protocol is that devised by the Border Patrol in 1984 when they tested the Ruger Security- and Speed-Sixes against the Smith & Wesson Model 65-3 revolvers. That was a 10,000 round per-gun test, but with a 500 round continuous firing sub-test phase incorporated (for the Rugers, at the 3,100 round point in the testing) into the testing process; the average firing time per gun was 3:30 minutes going through 10 boxes per gun.

    Every 500 rounds the guns were cleaned, WHICH INCLUDED REMOVING THE CYLINDERS FROM THE YOKES (my bolding here).

    Spoiler alert: The Rugers sailed through (and the testers felt that the guns could be placed in field service after the testing), while none of the S&Ws lasted more than 2,500 rounds in what was supposed to be their 10,000 round test protocol.

    Best, Jon
    Sponsored by Check-Mate Industries and BH Spring Solutions
    Certified Glock Armorer

  2. #112
    Quote Originally Posted by JonInWA View Post
    Here's a potential perspective:

    How do you envision your use/use venues of the GP100? Carry? Defensive? Duty? IDPA/ASI? USPSA? Area 1?

    For most of these venues, as long as the sucker works well (and without binding) for 200 rounds, I think you're fine. That assumes, of course, that you'll properly clean and lightly lube between uses, and that you're using quality ammunition.

    For total anti-zombie piece of mind, I think the best test protocol is that devised by the Border Patrol in 1984 when they tested the Ruger Security- and Speed-Sixes against the Smith & Wesson Model 65-3 revolvers. That was a 10,000 round per-gun test, but with a 500 round continuous firing sub-test phase incorporated (for the Rugers, at the 3,100 round point in the testing) into the testing process; the average firing time per gun was 3:30 minutes going through 10 boxes per gun.

    Every 500 rounds the guns were cleaned, WHICH INCLUDED REMOVING THE CYLINDERS FROM THE YOKES (my bolding here).

    Spoiler alert: The Rugers sailed through (and the testers felt that the guns could be placed in field service after the testing), while none of the S&Ws lasted more than 2,500 rounds in what was supposed to be their 10,000 round test protocol.

    Best, Jon
    My uses are primary carry/defense, and I’d like to get into shooting competitively. The “anti-zombie” dependability would certainly be nice, and Rugers certainly are capable of it.

    Based on what I’ve described with my GP100, and considering it went 1000 rounds without ever binding but last range trip binding a little after over 75 rounds, would you consider it good to go for those uses?

  3. #113
    Quote Originally Posted by SwampDweller View Post
    My uses are primary carry/defense, and I’d like to get into shooting competitively. The “anti-zombie” dependability would certainly be nice, and Rugers certainly are capable of it.

    Based on what I’ve described with my GP100, and considering it went 1000 rounds without ever binding but last range trip binding a little after over 75 rounds, would you consider it good to go for those uses?
    When you pulled the mainspring off did you pull the trigger group and the cylinder off as well?

  4. #114
    Quote Originally Posted by Flamingo View Post
    When you pulled the mainspring off did you pull the trigger group and the cylinder off as well?
    Yes, though I did not disassemble the cylinder. I did just get the tool to do so but I haven’t yet endeavored to try that yet.

  5. #115
    Member JonInWA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Auburn, WA
    You really don't need to to a total detailed disassembly of the cylinder in all likelihood in most situations; you just need to get it off the yoke so you can clean the ball bearing's raceway and the yoke shaft. Best, Jon
    Sponsored by Check-Mate Industries and BH Spring Solutions
    Certified Glock Armorer

  6. #116
    Quote Originally Posted by JonInWA View Post
    You really don't need to to a total detailed disassembly of the cylinder in all likelihood in most situations; you just need to get it off the yoke so you can clean the ball bearing's raceway and the yoke shaft. Best, Jon
    I may venture to do that this weekend. I have a hunch that it wouldn't do anything about binding after rapidly shooting a lot of .357 though. It's weird because I'm half thinking it's fine as it does go a while without binding, but seemingly it can no longer go a 200 rounds without binding. Perhaps in the first 1k rounds I just never got it hot enough.

  7. #117
    When I had binding from stuff under the extractor star, I confirmed it with a simple process.

    1. Shoot, eject, reload, find out cylinder won't close easily

    2. Remove the rounds, wipe off under the extractor star and the rod with a cleaning patch. Get it clean and dry.

    3. Close the cylinder. If it closes easily, there you go - it's powder crud.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •