https://magpul.com/amag-17-sg9-sig-p320-m17.html
Magpul introduces a metal magazine for P320 or M17.
Here's a funny part: their Twitter says "where there simply isn't room for polymer". Meanwhile, I have 2 ETS P320 magazines. Now, certainly, ETS mags for P320 have issues, but they mostly have to do with ETS skimping on design and manufacturing, not with the polymer as such. Simply using a better sculpture of the follower would make them perfectly acceptable for me (mind, I'm not a cop).
It's disappointing that Magpul didn't use their expertise to improve ETS magazines instead of this. Also, their marketing is dumb. And their price is too high. I bought those ETS magazines for $18 apiece. But who am I kidding, of course I'll buy those AMAGs when I see them. I need them for testing.