Question for the legal, medical legal experts.
A number of people are making hay of the fact that the deceased in this case potentially could have survived if she had received more prompt, timely, or appropriate Medical Care. They may actually be correct. Can't say for certain without reviewing the entire medical record, EMS run sheet, etc.
My question:
If her gunshot wound was indeed survivable and the medical care led to her death. Does one not still argue that the whole reason she received poor Medical Care to begin with was that she was shot to begin with, and therefore the defendant in this case is culpable?