I'm not a science geek, so someone who has a larger knowledge base than I should weigh in.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0626131854.htm
I'm not a science geek, so someone who has a larger knowledge base than I should weigh in.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0626131854.htm
Fairness leads to extinction much faster than harsh parameters.
From the article:
Pretty much says it all.To explain the seemingly contradictory result that glucose deprivation reduced viability and at the same time increased signaling, the authors used an unbiased systems-biology approach that included phospho-tyrosine mass spectrometry and other biochemical profiling techniques.
I tried using Google Translate to put that into English... my computer froze up.Originally Posted by Al T.
From the article:
Pretty much says it all.
What I gathered from the article... stop feeding the cancer cells... they die.
And the collective knowledge base re: insulin resistance, plasma glucose levels and chronic inflammation as contributory mechanisms for a whole host of neoplasms is strengthened.
The medical/research community has known for years that high plasma levels of glucose, reduced insulin sensitivity and chronic inflammation are the harbingers of many/most chronic diseases.
Why is this not more common knowledge among the general population? Why aren't more physicians concentrating on disease prevention through mitigation of these processes?
Well, all I have to say is the (mainstream) shooting community isn't the only insular body resistant to change due to dogmatic ignorance of rationally-presented evidence that contradicts the status quo.
BAZINGA!!!And the collective knowledge base re: insulin resistance, plasma glucose levels and chronic inflammation as contributory mechanisms for a whole host of neoplasms is strengthened.
The medical/research community has known for years that high plasma levels of glucose, reduced insulin sensitivity and chronic inflammation are the harbingers of many/most chronic diseases.
Why is this not more common knowledge among the general population? Why aren't more physicians concentrating on disease prevention through mitigation of these processes?
Well, all I have to say is the (mainstream) shooting community isn't the only insular body resistant to change due to dogmatic ignorance of rationally-presented evidence that contradicts the status quo.
Most people want to change 'hardware', b/c a) it's easier to blame and b) it's easier to replace. 'Software' changes take too much time and effort.
Fairness leads to extinction much faster than harsh parameters.
Reply With Quote