Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 118

Thread: 2015 is the year to dump the .308?

  1. #1

    2015 is the year to dump the .308?

    Article: The 6.5mm solution

    Article really needs editing but the data is solid.
    #RESIST

  2. #2
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Canton GA
    Timely article - I want to spend more time on Precision Style Rifle this year.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Vienna, VA
    Good as it goes, but I'd submit that 2010 was the year to dump the .308. The 6.5 Creedmore has been out for how long now?
    -C

    My blog: The Way of the Multigun

  4. #4
    Interesting. I've contemplated replacing our SRT 308 sniper rifles with something in the 260 range. I haven't explored what is available in ammo though.

  5. #5
    Site Supporter Failure2Stop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    FL Space Coast
    2015 is the year to dump the bolt-action .308?

    I would agree with my edit.
    Personally, I have 0 need for a bolt .308.
    Since all of my .308 use is built around a 16" or 14.5" semi-auto, in order to dump the cartridge I would need a superior 0-800 meter cartridge that feeds and shoots reliably from a 20+ round magazine, that gives equal or better performance in tissue, and for barrier defeat.
    I think that the .260 and some other cartridges hold promise, but are hampered by minimum barrel length requirements to see the ballistic advantage and the lack of bulk high-density training/burner ammo and other specialty ammo natures.
    Director Of Sales
    Knight's Armament Company

  6. #6
    Site Supporter Odin Bravo One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    In the back of beyond
    I guess I'll have to side with F2S (again).

  7. #7
    Member Sal Picante's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    SunCoast
    Helluva read... But... WTKitten to I know about rifles?!


  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    2015 is the year to dump the bolt-action .308?

    I would agree with my edit.
    Personally, I have 0 need for a bolt .308.
    Since all of my .308 use is built around a 16" or 14.5" semi-auto, in order to dump the cartridge I would need a superior 0-800 meter cartridge that feeds and shoots reliably from a 20+ round magazine, that gives equal or better performance in tissue, and for barrier defeat.
    I think that the .260 and some other cartridges hold promise, but are hampered by minimum barrel length requirements to see the ballistic advantage and the lack of bulk high-density training/burner ammo and other specialty ammo natures.
    I'm very certain that the article was written from the perspective of the long range match shooter and those guys prefer bolt guns due to the extra bits of accuracy one can eke out from a bolt. From your perspective, what you posted makes absolute sense.
    #RESIST

  9. #9
    The .308 definitely has some benefits... because of developed ammo in semi auto platforms. Almost all of the .308 drawbacks are irrelevant within 200m, which is the application used in carbines.

    6.5 has benefits, but the ballistics of 7mm-08 are superior in energy, wounding potential, equal on wind and not far removed on drop (in well chosen ammo, like the Nosler ABLR as measured by Brian Litz for BC), so the article is a bit of a disservice.

  10. #10
    Very Pro Dentist Chuck Haggard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Down the road from Quantrill's big raid.
    Pretty sure I won't be selling off my deer gun anytime soon.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •