I just don't believe this. Wasn't he paying attention to the target? Wasn't it obvious something was not right?
http://sploid.gizmodo.com/what-happe...ium=socialflow
I just don't believe this. Wasn't he paying attention to the target? Wasn't it obvious something was not right?
http://sploid.gizmodo.com/what-happe...ium=socialflow
That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state;
"Well thar's yer problem!"
This guy is lucky to still have hands.
That doesn't even seem possible. There had to be next to zero powder in the rounds.
“If you know the way broadly you will see it in everything." - Miyamoto Musashi
Isn't the instruction usually, "stop looking at the target and concentrate on the front sight"? Maybe sometimes you do need to look at the target.Wasn't he paying attention to the target?
I've seen that photo before, at least I think I have, and I thought it was a deliberate test.
I'm mistaken, it wasn't that gun.Originally Posted by JV
Hmm... that looks dangerous.
Had a guy come into the gun shop I used to work at with something similar. Fired all six from a 586. Last one was half in cylinder and half in forcing cone. The shop used to have the barrel somewhere. No bulges or cracks in the barrel.
Formerly known as xpd54.
The opinions expressed in this post are my own and do not reflect the opinions or policies of my employer.
www.gunsnobbery.wordpress.com
Happens more often than you'd think. Here's an Airweight J-frame that filled the bore, reloaded, and then noticed something was wrong when a bullet got jammed up halfway between cylinder and forcing cone. (You can see that some vigor was used in trying to open the cylinder.)
I feel the best way to express my emotions here is via gif:
How does someone seriously do that? Not only do it but not lose a finger in the process?
Semper Gumby, Always Flexible
Reply With Quote
