http://premieractionshootingsports.com/
I haven't read all the rules yet. But not sure I agree with their rationale on putting WML and Lasers into Race Pistol Division.
Also, yet another copyrighted target design?....Sigh....
Cody
http://premieractionshootingsports.com/
I haven't read all the rules yet. But not sure I agree with their rationale on putting WML and Lasers into Race Pistol Division.
Also, yet another copyrighted target design?....Sigh....
Cody
That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state;
Is that a nickel plated Hi-Point on their home page?
First glance = IDPA with fault lines. I'm down.
I like it. Everything I like about USPSA, and all the good things about IDPA. I hope it takes off.
I can totally understand the no AIWB rule but holster behind centerline is silly, unless of course those who carry OWB slightly forward of that position are OK but that's doubtful. At least they appear to not pretend to be something they are not.
Think for yourself. Question authority.
If they're going to shoot their own target, they can at least do a better job. If you simply put the bottom of the -1 2.5" below the -0 (making it equidistant with the sides) you'd have a much better design. And -2 for a peripheral hit? And an ocular window, why is that so much to ask for.
I really like the Givens/Higginbotham approach of not set targets to allow for experimentation and an overlay with reasonable scoring areas that allows the use of normal cardboard targets.
- It's not the odds, it's the stakes.
- If you aren't dry practicing every week, you're not serious.....
- "Tache-Psyche Effect - a polite way of saying 'You suck.' " - GG
Same old subjective crap as IDPA: "no noticeable bulge"......"suitable for every day carry"......bla bla bla
I'll PASS
No interest since AIWB is out. Not changing my daily method of carry for a game.