I'm not a revolver guy...so this is 442 size?
Pocket carry?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
I'm not a revolver guy...so this is 442 size?
Pocket carry?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
AKA: SkyLine1
The LCR works pretty well for pocket carry with the caveat that you need bigger pockets to accommodate the factory stocks. The Crimson Trace stocks are a little smaller and work better.Originally Posted by SkyLine1
My stock LCR is in between the sizes of my J frames with the CT 305 and the boot grip. The Ruger is smaller in height than the 642 with the 305s, bigger than the 351 I have with the boot grips.
Pity; I was hoping for some revolutionary new mechanism. So its basically same sheep, different wool? Pardon me while I yawn...
.
I'm gonna try one out.
Ruger has these boot grips that work well for pocket carry Much better than factory Hogues.
I know Ruger sometimes does limited runs for dealer specials or whatever. Like they just did a limited run of Single Sevens in .327. Is the new 9mm LCR something like that? Or a regular new product introduction?
Last edited by Stephen; 09-22-2014 at 02:47 PM.
I'll have one of these, had planned to get a .38 LCR soon as well.
FYI for those who don't like rubber stocks Eagle has wood stocks - https://eaglegrips.com/62-ruger-lcr-grips
They look pretty good for pocket carry (I personally strongly dislike rubber stocks on pocket guns, they tend to stick in the pocket for me).
-Rob
My inner gun nerd wants to go spend several hundred dollars so I can prove to myself yet again how much moon clips suck.
That's going to have some snappy recoil.
Resist; your inner wallet will thank you.
.
Reply With Quote
