Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Some (Very) Brief Notes on an AR-15 Tech Inspect Clinic

  1. #1
    Site Supporter Jay Cunningham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA

    Some (Very) Brief Notes on an AR-15 Tech Inspect Clinic

    The chambers on a DPMS and a Palmetto carbine failed to gauge properly on a 5.56mm NATO go/no-go... both had their tight chambers reamed to true 5.56mm. Both barrels were marked "5.56mm"... go figure.

    The DPMS had out of spec gas rings, which were replaced (thanks SeanM your box of pieces parts is still making the world a better place).

    Neither the DPMS nor the Palmetto had worthwhile markings on their bolts; I recommended replacement bolts of a known quantity.

    Both the DPMS and Palmetto were carbine gas systems with 16" barrels, however they both had CAR buffers, which I consider suboptimal for that configuration. I recommended either H or preferably H2 buffer replacement.

    The DPMS had no staking at all from receiver end plate to "castle nut", which I repaired with a spring-loaded center punch.

    Astonishingly, both the DPMS and Palmetto guns had decently attached and staked carrier keys. Both also had proper inserts in the extractor spring. The Palmetto had both M4 feed ramps and barrel extensions, and the DPMS had rifle ramps/rifle extensions. This was fine for the A1 configuration.

    After these tweaks, proper lubrication and function checks, both guns ran without issue and exhibited good accuracy.
    Last edited by Jay Cunningham; 09-20-2014 at 07:42 PM.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    SATX
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay Cunningham View Post
    The chambers on a DPMS and a Palmetto carbine failed to gauge properly on a 5.56mm NATO go/no-go... both had their tight chambers reamed to true 5.56mm. Both barrels were marked "5.56mm"... go figure.

    The DPMS had out of spec gas rings, which were replaced (thanks SeanM your box of pieces parts is still making the world a better place).

    Neither the DPMS nor the Palmetto had worthwhile markings on their bolts; I recommended replacement bolts of a known quantity.

    Both the DPMS and Palmetto were carbine gas systems with 16" barrels, however they both had CAR buffers, which I consider suboptimal for that configuration. I recommended either H or preferably H2 buffer replacement.

    The DPMS had no staking at all from receiver end plate to "castle nut", which I repaired with a spring-loaded center punch.

    Astonishingly, both the DPMS and Palmetto guns had decently attached and staked carrier keys. Both also had proper inserts in the extractor spring. The Palmetto had both M4 feed ramps and barrel extensions, and the DPMS had rifle ramps/rifle extensions. This was fine for the A1 configuration.

    After these tweaks, proper lubrication and function checks, both guns ran without issue and exhibited good accuracy.

    Just for my education, what is the current "proper" extractor spring/insert combo?

  3. #3
    Site Supporter Jay Cunningham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    The black insert is appropriate for carbines.

  4. #4
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Allen, TX
    Jay,

    I've seen about a dozen DPMS M4gery carbines that failed gas ring tests right out of the box (all of them). Replaced gas rings and they still failed. IOW, had overbored bolt carriers. With regard to "5.56 NATO" barrel markings, I've learned that unless the barrel is a Colt, BCM or LMT, it's likely fiction. I use Ned Christiansen's NATO chamber gauge and reamer to handle all the others.
    Regional Government Sales Manager for Aimpoint, Inc. USA
    Co-owner Hardwired Tactical Shooting (HiTS)

  5. #5
    Very Pro Dentist Chuck Haggard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Down the road from Quantrill's big raid.
    I was issued a Bushampster M4gery at work, I had to ream the chamber to 5.56 and drop in a Colt BCG, after that it ran fine. We had several that had to be fixed right out of the box.

  6. #6
    Site Supporter Jay Cunningham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Wayne, I was concerned that the inner dimensions of the BCG would be out of spec, but gas ring replacement passed the "drop" test.

    Interestingly enough, the owner of said DPMS had a past bad experience with a stuck case. Hmm... your chamber was too tight, and your bad gas rings were probably contributing to less-than-robust-cycling...

  7. #7
    Site Supporter Jay Cunningham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    I have Ned Christiansen's chamber reamer, go/no-go gauge, and MOACKS. The guy is a mad genius.

  8. #8
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Allen, TX
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay Cunningham View Post
    I have Ned Christiansen's chamber reamer, go/no-go gauge, and MOACKS. The guy is a mad genius.
    He is for sure. I recommend his products to all the armorer classes I teach for Colt so that those guys can deal with the "other" ARs they have in service.
    Regional Government Sales Manager for Aimpoint, Inc. USA
    Co-owner Hardwired Tactical Shooting (HiTS)

  9. #9
    Jay out of curiosity which PSA kit/carbine was it? Was is one of the lower end PTAC, Blackhawk kits or was it one of their, "premium kits?"

  10. #10
    New Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    East Palestine, OH

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •