I'd take whichever one I had at the time.
They're both good reliable pistols, and if I were aiming to E&E I wouldn't be looking to use it unless the need arised.
And I'd be working pretty hard on avoiding needing it.
I'd take whichever one I had at the time.
They're both good reliable pistols, and if I were aiming to E&E I wouldn't be looking to use it unless the need arised.
And I'd be working pretty hard on avoiding needing it.
https://www.facebook.com/dave.bateman.311
kimbers have more issues than time magazine.
Of the two choices, probably the G17. I really like the Beretta but I've had more trigger time on the Glock. Now if I wasn't confined to those two options, I'd go with a CZ 75. More rounds through the 75 than Glocks and Berettas combined.
I don't care for either choice, but I have marginally more experience with the Beretta, so...
Recovering Gun Store Commando. My Blog: The Clue Meter
“It doesn’t matter what the problem is, the solution is always for us to give the government more money and power, while we eat less meat.”
Glenn Reynolds
Beretta. I prefer a hammer fired metal frame gun these days. 18 rounds in the mag beats 15-17. And it'll probably fetch more money when I trade it off to some Kurd, so that I can buy a plane ticket of that shithole.
Originally Posted by montanadave
Why not just ask, "Which do you prefer?"
If I'm dropped into Iraq I'd want a working knowledge of Arabic and a good tan.
Glock 17
GLOCK 17
Glock 17 (or 19) would be my first preference; but I wouldn't feel too put out if I had to go with the Beretta, either.
Best, Jon
17 and Brett Keisel's beard
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
It is so utterly irrelevant as to what pistol you have...
You're so screwed.
Kevin S. Boland
Director of R&D
Law Tactical LLC
www.lawtactical.com
kevin@lawtactical.com
407-451-4544
Reply With Quote