Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 40

Thread: Anyone know much about .32 H&R Magnum?

  1. #21
    Site Supporter Tamara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    In free-range, non-GMO, organic, fair trade Broad Ripple, IN
    Quote Originally Posted by 5pins View Post
    And the .32 mag came out as an improvement over the .32 long in the 80’s IIRC.
    Yup. It was supposed to be the "Poor Man's Magnum", and the reason the commercial ammo is so mild is because of the H&R revos that debuted the cartridge. There are some Ruger-only handloads floating around out there that may have been the genesis of the .327.
    Books. Bikes. Boomsticks.

    I can explain it to you. I can’t understand it for you.

  2. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    far nor cal
    Thanks for the infor regarding the 32's. I have shot the 327 but never even hear of these older ones.

  3. #23
    Site Supporter Tamara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    In free-range, non-GMO, organic, fair trade Broad Ripple, IN
    Heh. In terms of cartridge development, it's hard for me to think of the Eighties as "older". There are only a couple-few commercially successful handgun rounds newer than the .32 H&R, after all.
    Last edited by Tamara; 08-21-2014 at 06:15 PM.
    Books. Bikes. Boomsticks.

    I can explain it to you. I can’t understand it for you.

  4. #24
    Member Al T.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Columbia SC
    Federal .327s for 28 bucks a box at my LGS (20 cartridges @ 85 grain IIRC).

  5. #25
    Member Wheeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Jawja
    Now I really wish I had access to a chrono. I'd be interested to see how the numbers look out of a 4" barrel.
    Men freely believe that which they desire.
    Julius Caesar

  6. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    far nor cal
    Quote Originally Posted by Tamara View Post
    Heh. In terms of cartridge development, it's hard for me to think of the Eighties as "older". There are only a couple-few commercially successful handgun rounds newer than the .32 H&R, after all.
    I was born in 81' I thought that this cartridge was much older than an eighties development. Maybe I should have googled it before I gave away my age. The 327 to me seemed like a fun little cartridge. Do any of you with these "older" 32s have any problems sourcing ammo?

  7. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    SWF
    Quote Originally Posted by Tamara View Post
    Having used a Smith 432PD for a BUG/winter coat pocket gun for almost a decade, I have a reasonably large amount of .32 H&R Magnum ammo on hand. I keep a few hundred rounds of it loose in an ammo can, and it was dumped in there from commercial boxes that I'd acquired over the years.

    The loose ammo in the can consists of Federal 95gr SWCs and 85gr JHPs, as well as Georgia Arms 100gr SJHPs. The Federal HP loads are distinguishable at a glance, with the jacket running all the way to the hollowpoint cavity and the red sealant around the primers.

    When I ran a ten shot string of the 85gr JHPs over the chrono today, just for giggles, and was surprised to see an extreme spread of 114.2 fps, almost four times as wide as the 95gr target loads I'd just shot. I'm wondering if, what with the 85gr JHPs likely coming from different lots bought years apart, if Federal either hotted up or toned down the caliber at some point?
    Can you show me a pic of the 432PD and does it hold over 5rds?

  8. #28
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Erie County, NY
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=za0wzkQhT6M

    Holds 6 shots. The clip is firing the Federal round. That is not hard to find at local gun stores, Cabelas, etc.

    As far as pointing the gun at the camera - oh, well.

  9. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Lower Michigan
    I shot the Federal and Buffalo Bore rounds into milk cartons of water (sort of the old Firearms Tactical/McPhereson test) from 7 yards and through 4 layers of denim. DocGKR, I am not, but I thought it was worth a look. NO expansion on any round. I dropped the denim and got closer. You could have re-used the bullets almost. So, I tested the 100 gr full wadcutter Fiocchi target load with 4 layers of denim and got the proper amount of penetration (it's been so long, I forget now what that number in water is) and said "well, at least it doesn't kick..."

  10. #30
    Site Supporter Tamara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    In free-range, non-GMO, organic, fair trade Broad Ripple, IN
    I wouldn't expect the JHP to expand at <900fps. I doubt you'd get much, if any, from the SJHPs, either.
    Books. Bikes. Boomsticks.

    I can explain it to you. I can’t understand it for you.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •